312.0 EGSTPOLACPP

CH-VS

Art. 4 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Infractions de droit fédéral

Autorités pénales - Police

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (50 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 4 LACPP · Infractions de droit fédéral

1. La police cantonale enquête sur des infractions de sa propre initiative, sur dénonciation de particuliers ou d'autorités ainsi que sur mandat du ministère public; dans ce cadre, elle est soumise à la surveillance et aux instructions du ministère public.

2. En cas de péril en la demeure ou sur requête de la police cantonale, la police communale peut coopérer aux mesures d'investigation. La police cantonale assume la direction des opérations. La législation spéciale demeure réservée.

← Art. 3 LACPP Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Infractions de droit fédéral Art. 5 LACPP →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (45)

SBK.2025.166 · ag (§ 4 Abs. 5 EG StPO)

Procedural Error in Detention Request Does Not Void Detention

Cited in the dispositive to establish that the prosecution's request for pre-trial detention was submitted in violation of this provision.

P/9114/2021 · ge (art. 4 al. 1 CPP)

Extension of Substitution Measures Upheld Despite Challenge to Right to Be Heard and New Jurisprudence on Reoffending Risk

Cited in the ruling (point 5.4) to affirm the court's independence and subjection only to the law, regardless of the prosecution's requests.

SK 2024 369 · be (Art. 4 Abs. 1 StPO)

Accused's Recusal Motion Denied Despite Judge's Former Supervisory Role

Cited in the reasoning (E. 13) regarding the independence of judges in applying the law.

CA.2024.16 (Art. 4 Abs. 2 StPO)

Recusal of Judge Denied Due to Lack of Grounds

Cited in relation to the fundamental right to a constitutional judge.

BES.2022.107 · bs (Art. 4 StPO)

Conflict of Interest Recusal Against Cantonal Prosecutor Rejected

Although discussed, this provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders but rather in the reasoning.

ARMP.2021.122 · ne (Art. 365/4 CPP)

Failure to Appear at Hearing Deemed Withdrawal of Opposition to Penal Order

Cited in the facts section as the provision mentioned on the summons regarding the deemed withdrawal of opposition.

SB.2017.107 · bs (Art. 4 Abs. 1 StPO)

Appeal of Perjury Conviction Based on Bound Factual Findings

Cited to affirm the principle of independence of criminal authorities in legal application.

ARMP.2017.12 · ne (Art. 4 CPP)

Prosecutor's Attempted Rogatory Commission in Drug Trafficking Case Overruled for Undue Delay

Cited when discussing the principle of the independence of criminal authorities, which is related to the limits of giving instructions.

SF160004 · zh (Art. 4 StPO)

Application for Judicial Recusal Dismissed

This provision regarding the obligation of authorities to be independent and subject only to law was cited in the reasoning (considerations), not the dispositive.

BES.2016.49 · bs (§ 4 lit. c EG StPO)

Prosecutorial Delay in Criminal Investigation Leads to Successful Complaint

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

HB.2015.28 · bs (§ 4 lit. c und § 17 lit. b des Gesetzes über die Einführung der Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung [EG StPO] (SG 57.100))

Appeal Against Extension of Pre-Trial Detention for Robbery and Fraud

Cited to establish the competent appellate court (Appellationsgericht als Einzelgericht) for the appeal.

HB.2014.36 · bs (§ 4 lit. c und § 17 lit. b EG StPO)

Physiotherapist's Pre-Trial Detention Overturned on Bail

These procedural rules determine that the Cantonal Court of Appeal acts as the single judge competent to hear the appeal.

RRB.Nr.2014.000496 · ag (Art. 4 Abs. 1 StPO)

Credit Statement Approval Not a Pending Matter; Third-Party Data Rules Apply

Cited to underline the independence of criminal authorities and the resulting limitations on supervisory powers.

UH140013 · zh (Art. 4 StPO)

Prosecutor v. Defendant on Stay of Illegal Residence Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of separation of powers concerning judicial instruction to the Public Prosecutor's Office.

BB.2013.89 (art. 4 al. 1 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court Denies Full Access to Case Files Amid Ongoing Investigation

Cited to establish the principle of independence of criminal authorities, limiting the recourse authority's ability to issue instructions.