312.0
EGSTPOLACPP
CH-VS
Art. 37 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Approbation de l'ordonnance pénale
Procédures spéciales
Art. 37 LACPP · Approbation de l'ordonnance pénale
1. Les ordonnances pénales doivent être approuvées
a) * pour l'office central, par le procureur général adjoint;
b) pour les offices régionaux, par le premier procureur.
1bis Dans tous les cas, l’approbation peut être donnée par le procureur général.
2. La procédure d'approbation est arrêtée dans le règlement interne ou par voie de directive.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (22)
ZZ.1999.24 · so (§ 37 StPO)
Acquitted Defendant Compensation and Legal Expense Insurance
Cited in the headnote as a legal basis concerning the compensation awarded to the acquitted accused.
ZZ.1994.23 · so (§ 37 Abs. 2 StPO)
Victim Legal Aid Access in Cantonal Criminal Procedure
Cited to explain that the victim can only be awarded party compensation (Parteientschädigung) in the criminal aspect, which is distinct from legal aid.
ZZ.1993.21 · so (§ 37 Abs. 1 StPO)
Right to Compensation After Discontinued Investigation
Cited as the basis for granting compensation from the state upon request when proceedings are discontinued.
ZZ.1990.35 · so (§ 37 Abs. 2 StPO)
Compensation Entitlement in Mixed Criminal and Civil Proceedings
The court granted the victims' request for compensation for costs incurred in the criminal proceedings because the formal prerequisites were met following the conviction of the accused.
ZZ.1986.14 · so (§ 37 Abs. 2 StPO)
Exclusion of Injured Party in Juvenile Criminal Proceedings
This provision governs the claim for party compensation, which was denied because the appellant lacked party status.
BG.2025.71 (art. 33-37 CPP)
Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case
These articles are mentioned as governing special forums in criminal procedure, which are then discussed in relation to the general rule.
BG.2025.34 (Art. 37 StPO)
Jurisdiction Dispute: Bern v. Zurich
This article is mentioned as one of the provisions outlining the legally established place of jurisdiction from which an exception can be made.
AbR.2008.09.Nr.19 · ow (Art. 37 Abs. 2 StPO)
Confrontation Hearings and Fair Trial Rights
Cited to confirm the possibility of confrontation interrogations to clarify contradictions.
AK.2015.320 · sg (Art. 37 StPO)
Logistics Provider Non-Liability in Seized Mail Case and Forfeiture Jurisdiction
Cited to establish that separate confiscation proceedings must take place where the seized items are located, which was outside the jurisdiction of the court.
AK.2015.320 · sg (Art. 37 StPO)
Logistics Provider Criminal Proceedings Non-Initiation Upheld; Forfeiture Precluded.
Cited in the context of determining the proper jurisdiction for a potential independent confiscation procedure for the seized items.
AbR.1998.99.Nr.43 · ow (Art. 37 Abs. 3 StPO)
Right to Fair Trial Violated Due to Inadequate Witness Confrontation and Lack of Interpreter
Applied to ensure the accused's right to a fair trial when they cannot directly question victims, by allowing them or their lawyer to submit written questions.
72.2011.37 · ti (art. 37 CPP)
Appeal on Sentencing for Dual Brawl Incidents
Cited in the preamble before the final orders (though not explicitly in the dispositive orders 1-9, it is part of the general cited legal basis).
72.2011.103 · ti (art. 12, 34, 37, 40, 43, 44, 51 CPP)
Aggravated Drug Trafficking and Forgery Sentencing
Cited among the articles used to pronounce the judgment, these articles relate to general criminal procedure not explicitly detailed as the main ground or costs/security.
Arr.t.2010.1661 · vd (Art. 37 CPP)
Recusal of Investigating Judges Due to Complaint Against Colleague
Cited by the Judge of Instruction as the basis for his spontaneous request for recusal.
STREK.2008.19 · so (§ 37 Abs. 2 StPO)
Victim Compensation Reduced Due to Unnecessary Claim Escalation
This provision is cited as the basis for the court's decision to reduce the party compensation payable by the accused.