312.0 EGSTPOLACPP

CH-VS

Art. 33 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Profils d'ADN

Mesures de contrainte

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (50 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 33 LACPP · Profils d'ADN

1. Les mesures d'identification au moyen d'un profil ADN sont réglées par la loi fédérale sur l'utilisation de profils d'ADN dans les procédures pénales et sur l'identification de personnes inconnues ou disparues (loi sur les profils d'ADN).

2. L'autorité judiciaire compétente au sens de l'article 17 de la loi sur les profils d'ADN pour approuver l'effacement est le président de l'autorité ayant statué en dernière instance cantonale.

← Art. 32 LACPP Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Infractions de droit fédéral Art. 34 LACPP →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (222)

RBOG.2018.Nr.12 · tg (Art. 33 StPO)

Refusal to Unify Separate Drug Offense Proceedings Against Alleged Co-Perpetrators

Mentioned as a rule governing jurisdiction when offenses span different cantons, although the specific application was ultimately superseded.

BG.2026.20 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)

Jurisdictional Dispute: Nidwalden vs. Aargau on Drug Trafficking Investigation

Used to determine the competent jurisdiction as the place where the first investigative measures were taken.

BG.2025.85 (Art. 33 CPP)

Jurisdiction Dispute: Vaud Designated Competent Canton for Robbery Case

Cited in conjunction with Art. 34 al. 1 CPP to determine the legal venue based on the location of the first prosecution acts.

BG.2025.71 (art. 33-37 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case

These articles are mentioned as governing special forums in criminal procedure, which are then discussed in relation to the general rule.

BG.2025.67 (art. 33 al. 1 CPP)

Federal Court Affirms Bern's Jurisdiction in Human Trafficking Case

This provision states that participants in an offense are prosecuted and judged by the authority prosecuting and judging the perpetrator.

BG.2025.67 (art. 33 al. 2 CPP)

Federal Court Affirms Bern's Jurisdiction in Human Trafficking Case

This provision applies when several co-perpetrators commit an offense in different locations, determining jurisdiction based on where the first prosecution acts were undertaken.

BG.2025.51 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)

Jurisdiction Dispute: Basel-Stadt v. Basel-Landschaft on Co-Perpetration

This provision addresses the principle of 'forum praeventionis' (priority jurisdiction), which was applied to grant jurisdiction to the canton that first initiated proceedings for similar offenses.

BG.2025.60 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)

St. Gallen Jurisdiction over Cross-Cantonal Theft by Asylum Seekers

Applied to determine the competent jurisdiction when multiple perpetrators have committed an offense.

BG.2025.49 (Art. 33 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court Denies Jurisdiction Transfer in COVID-19 Loan Fraud Case

This article is mentioned in conjunction with Article 34 al. 1 CPP for cases involving multiple accused committing different offenses in multiple cantons.

BG.2025.34 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)

Jurisdiction Dispute: Bern v. Zurich

This provision is combined with Art. 34 Abs. 1 StPO to determine that, as a rule, all co-perpetrators are prosecuted where one of the co-perpetrators committed the offense punishable by the heaviest penalty.

SK.2025.9 (Art. 74 Abs. 2 StBOG i.V.m. Art. 33 f. StPO)

CO2 Emissions Tax Fraud and Bribery Scheme

Cited for designating the Canton of Bern as the canton for serving sentences.

BG.2025.8 (Art. 33 Abs. 2 StPO)

Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld

Applied to determine the competent authority in cases of joint commission of offenses in different cantons, focusing on the place where the most serious offense was committed or where prosecution first began.

BG.2025.8 (Art. 33 StPO)

Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld

Discussed in relation to the arguments of the Canton of Vaud, questioning its applicability.

BG.2025.42 (Art. 33 al. 1 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court: Bern Competent to Prosecute Vaudois Criminal Case Involving Human Trafficking Allegations

Cited regarding the prosecution and judgment of participants in an offense.

BG.2025.42 (Art. 33 al. 2 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court: Bern Competent to Prosecute Vaudois Criminal Case Involving Human Trafficking Allegations

Cited regarding the jurisdiction when several co-perpetrators commit an offense.