Art. 32 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Morts suspectes

STREK.2003.15 · so (§ 32 Abs. 3 StPO)

Costs in Private Prosecution Following Acquittal

The appeal was granted, freeing the appellant from the obligation to bear the costs, based on the provision regarding the imposition of procedural costs.

AKBES.2002.20 · so (§ 32 Abs. 2 STPO)

Complainant Not Liable for Costs Following Dismissal of Unfounded Complaint Before Formal Proceedings

This provision governs the imposition of procedural costs on the complainant when the proceedings are dismissed, which is contrasted with the actual situation where no formal proceedings were opened.

ZZ.1978.20 · so (§ 32 Abs. 4 StPO)

Acquittal in Trademark Infringement Suit and Allocation of Costs

Applied to allocate trial costs to the private prosecutor because the accused was acquitted in a case based on a complaint.

BG.2025.64 (Art. 32 Abs. 1 StPO)

Jurisdiction upheld for offenses on Swiss highway rest stop.

This provision is discussed but ultimately not applied, as the place of offense could be determined.

BG.2025.71 (art. 32 CPP)

Federal Criminal Court Rules Lucerne Competent to Prosecute Sexual Assault Case

This article is mentioned as the general rule for determining jurisdiction in criminal procedure.

BG.2025.8 (Art. 32 Abs. 1 StPO)

Jurisdiction over Fraud and Forgery Case: St. Gallen's Authority Upheld

Mentioned as a potential basis for jurisdiction in the absence of determined place of execution.

BG.2025.17 (Art. 32 al. 1 CPP)

Detainee's Residence Establishes Geneva Jurisdiction for Murder Threats

Applied to determine jurisdiction when the place of commission of the offense cannot be determined and the accused's habitual residence is in Geneva.

BG.2024.49 (Art. 32 Abs. 1 StPO)

Jurisdiction over Offenses Abroad: Habitual Residence vs. Registered Address

Determines jurisdiction for prosecution and judgment when the crime was committed abroad or the location cannot be determined, based on the accused's place of residence or usual stay.

BG.2024.49 (Art. 32 Abs. 2 StPO)

Jurisdiction over Offenses Abroad: Habitual Residence vs. Registered Address

Determines jurisdiction for prosecution and judgment when the accused has neither residence nor usual stay in Switzerland, based on their place of origin, or where they are found.

BG.2023.55 (Art. 32 Abs. 1 StPO)

Basel-Stadt v. Lucerne: Jurisdiction over Document Forgery and Fraud

Applied subsidiarily to establish jurisdiction when the place of commission of the offense is unknown, by referring to the place where the effects of the offense occurred.

BG.2023.55 (Art. 32 Abs. 3 StPO)

Basel-Stadt v. Lucerne: Jurisdiction over Document Forgery and Fraud

Mentioned to illustrate that jurisdiction can be established for authorities requesting extradition when other criteria are not met.

BG.2023.55 (Art. 32 StPO)

Basel-Stadt v. Lucerne: Jurisdiction over Document Forgery and Fraud

Cited as the provision for determining jurisdiction when an offense is committed abroad or the place of the offense is unknown.

BG.2022.34 (Art. 32 Abs. 1 StPO)

Jurisdiction for Transmitted Threats

Applied subsidiarily to determine jurisdiction when the place of the offense cannot be determined.

BG.2022.30 (art. 32 cpv. 1 CPP)

Jurisdiction Dispute: Premature Filing Due to Lack of Cantonal Consensus

Applied to determine jurisdiction in cases where the crime may have been committed abroad, assigning competence to the defendant's domicile or habitual residence.

BG.2022.3 (Art. 32 StPO)

Jurisdiction Over Money Laundering Case: Geneva vs. Basel-Stadt

Cited in conjunction with Art. 31 StPO for the request for transfer of jurisdiction.