312.0
EGSTPOLACPP
CH-VS
Art. 3 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Egalité entre hommes et femmes
Objet de la loi
Art. 3 LACPP · Egalité entre hommes et femmes
1. Dans la présente loi, toute désignation de personne, de statut ou de fonction vise indifféremment l'homme ou la femme.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (416)
51/2013/45/und/46 · sh (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. c StPO)
Improper Dismissal of Criminal Case Under Abbreviated Procedure Without Main Hearing
Cited in connection with the fundamental right to be heard, justifying the need to question the parties regarding the appropriateness of the agreed-upon sanction.
BK 2011 161 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. b StPO)
Unfair Competition Prosecution Barred Due to Abuse of Rights in Evidence Submission Against Co-Conspirators
The use of the evidence was deemed inadmissible as it constituted an abuse of process governed by this provision.
501 2023 183 · fr (art. 3 al. 2 let. a CPP)
Appellate Ruling on Victim Standing, Acquittal for Bodily Harm, and State Compensation to Caregiver
Cited in the reasoning in relation to the principle of good faith applied to the MP's omission.
BK 2025 293 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 Bst. c StPO)
Appeal Against Non-Initiation of Proceedings for Breach of Professional Secrecy and Denial of Legal Aid
Cited in the reasoning concerning the violation of the right to be heard due to the incorrect procedure (non-commencement), which justified finding the violation in order no. 2.
BK 2025 348 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 Bst. a StPO)
Regional Court Decision Affirmed on Presumed Withdrawal of Criminal Penalty Opposition Due to Unexcused Absence
This article on the principle of good faith was cited in the reasoning section (E. 4) concerning the constitutional interpretation of the fictitious withdrawal.
P/4829/2024 · ge (art. 3 al. 2 let. c CPP)
Appeal for Restitution of Deadline to Oppose Criminal Ordinance Denied
Cited alongside the Constitution regarding the right to be heard.
UE250242 · zh (Art. 3 StPO)
Appeal dismissed: Insufficient evidence of police mistreatment.
Cited as a fundamental right that must not be violated in detention conditions, specifically regarding human dignity.
KSE 10 2024 · ai (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. c und Art. 107 StPO, Art. 29 Abs. 2 BV, Art. 6 Ziff. 1 EMRK)
Appeal Against Discontinuation of Proceedings Against Board Chairman
Cited in the context of the duty to provide reasons, derived from the right to be heard, although the court ultimately found the reasoning to be sufficient for the dismissed decision.
BK 2025 154 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 Bst. c StPO)
Prosecutor's Decision to Sever Joint Assault Trial Overturned Due to Procedural Flaws and Merits Analysis
Cited in the reasoning section (E. 3.2.1) as part of the constitutional guarantee of the right to be heard.
502 2025 164 · fr (art. 3 al. 2 let. c CPP)
Prosecutor's DNA Analysis Order Annulled Due to Procedural Violations
The mandate was annulled for violation of the right to be heard, which is anchored in this procedural provision.
BK 2024 438 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 Bst. c StPO)
Prosecutor's Refusal to Reopen Case and Initiate New Investigation Affirmed in Part, Procedural Flaw Noted in Part
Cited in the reasoning, as the violation of this article (right to be heard) led to a finding in order 1, even though the violation itself did not lead to the reversal of the non-commencement decision.
UE250099 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. c StPO)
Prosecutor's Refusal to Charge Affirmed in Traffic Accident Dispute Over Alleged False Testimony
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard.
UE250187 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 2 lit. c StPO)
Appeal Dismissal Conditional on Language Compliance and Security Deposit
Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of equal treatment of all parties, influencing the setting of the deadline for the counterparty's response.
BK 2025 25 · be (Art. 3 Abs. 2 Bst. c StPO)
Cantonal Court Appeal on Consolidation of Fake Vaccination Certificate Forgery Cases
Cited in the context of the right to be heard, although the final order did not rely on it for reversal.
ARMP.2025.51 · ne (Art. 3 al. 2 let. a CPP)
Former Partner's Private Complainant Standing Denied in Bankruptcy Theft Case
Cited in the reasoning (Considerant 5c) regarding the principle of good faith applicable to criminal authorities.