312.0 EGSTPOLACPP

CH-VS

Art. 14 Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Juridiction d'appel

Autorités pénales - Tribunaux et autres autorités

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (50 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 14 LACPP · Juridiction d'appel

1. La juridiction d'appel est le Tribunal cantonal.

2. Un juge du Tribunal cantonal peut connaître des appels contre les jugements des juges de district prononçant, à titre principal, une amende, une peine pécuniaire, un travail d'intérêt général ou une peine privative de liberté avec sursis, pour autant qu'un précédent sursis ne soit pas révoqué, le juge désigné pouvant toutefois déférer la cause à une cour du tribunal.

3. Dans les autres cas, l'appel relève d'une cour du Tribunal cantonal.

← Art. 13 LACPP Loi d'application du code de procédure pénale suisse (LACPP) - Infractions de droit fédéral Art. 15 LACPP →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (15)

P3 25 162 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)

Cantonal Court Upholds Penalty Order Based on Statutory Fiction of Delivery

Cited in the reasoning concerning the decision-making body for appeals against decisions on objection validity.

P3 24 194 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)

Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Conditional Release for Convicted Sex Offender

Cited in the reasoning regarding the status of the reviewing judge, but not explicitly in the final orders.

P3 24 163 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 StPO)

Prosecutor v. District Court on Jurisdiction for Defamation and Coercion Case

Applied to waive the collection of court fees exceptionally.

P3 23 305 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)

Appellant v. Prosecutor (Slander Discontinuation)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court judge.

P3 22 174 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)

Dismissal of Defamation Complaint Due to Procedural and Substantive Insufficiency

Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for appealing the non-committal order.

P3 22 69 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)

Prosecutor's Suspension of Criminal Proceedings Overruled Due to Unreasonable Delay

Cited as a procedural basis concerning the court competence to review the appeal against the suspension order.

P3 21 258 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 EGStPO)

Refusal of Conditional Release Upheld Due to Reoffending Risk and Non-Cooperation with Deportation

Cited to establish that the appeal body is a judge of the Cantonal Court.

P3 21 245 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO)

Defamation Jurisdiction Challenge Dismissed on Venue Grounds

Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal instance, but not in the final orders.

P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 EGStPO)

Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed

Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.

P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 Satz 1 EGStPO)

Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed

Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.

P1 14 46 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 Satz 2 und Abs. 3 EGStPO)

Claimant Appeal Regarding Coercion/Defamation Conviction and Cost Allocation Dismissed

Mentioned in the reasoning for establishing jurisdiction, but not cited in the dispositive.

P1 13 9 · vs (art. 14 al. 1 et 2 LACPP)

Appeal on Breach of Trust Conviction and Custody Dispute Over Dog

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

P3 12 190 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 StPO i.V.m. Art. 13 Abs. 1 des Einführungsgesetzes zur Schweizerischen Strafprozessordnung vom 11. Februar 2009 [EGStPO; SGS/VS 312.0])

Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings for Fork Fracture on Rented Scooter

Cited regarding the jurisdiction of a single judge of the Cantonal Court to hear the appeal.

A3 11 13 · vs (Art. 14 Ziff. 2 und 194bis der Strafprozessordnung vom 22. Februar 1962 (StPO/VS))

Municipality Fines Developer for Permit Violation; Procedural Flaw Leads to Case Transfer and Compensation

These articles establish the authority of the single judge to rule on the appeal.

A3 09 22 · vs (Art. 14 Ziff. 2 StPO)

Building Fine Appeal: Procedural Violation Cured by Subsequent Hearing

Cited as the basis for the appealability of the administrative penalty decision to the cantonal court judge.