211.1
EGZGBLACC
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 114 Loi d'application du code civil suisse (LACC) - Autorités de recours
Application du droit privé fédéral - Affaires judiciaires civiles - Juridiction civile non contentieuse - Procédures spéciales - Organisation des autorités de protection de l'enfant et de l'adulte
Art. 114 LACC · Autorités de recours
1. L'autorité de recours est
a) * l'autorité de protection pour connaître des recours contre les actes ou les omissions du curateur, du tuteur, ou ceux du tiers ou de l'office mandaté (art. 419 CC);
b) un juge spécialisé désigné par le Tribunal cantonal pour connaître des appels fondés sur l'article 439 CC;
c) le Tribunal cantonal pour connaître des recours contre
1. les décisions sur recours de l'autorité de protection (art. 114 al. 1 let. a),
2. les mesures provisionnelles (art. 445 al. 3 CC),
3. les décisions prises par le juge spécialisé suite aux appels fondés sur l'article 439 CC,
4. les autres décisions de l'autorité de protection (art. 450 al. 1 CC).
2. Un juge unique peut connaître des recours de la compétence du Tribunal cantonal.
3. Ces voies de recours s'appliquent par analogie dans le domaine de la protection de l'enfant.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (43)
C1 24 211 · vs (Art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Appeal of Curatorship Establishment for Mentally Ill Individual
This provision defines the jurisdictional competence of the court to hear the appeal against the decision of the adult protection authority (though not strictly cited in the final orders, it underpins the admissibility check in 1.1).
C1 24 239 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Father Contact Suspension Overruled Due to Failure to Hear Children's Testimony
Cited as the legal basis for the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal to hear the appeal.
C1 25 99 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 3 i. V. m. Abs. 2 EGZGB)
In re Welfare Placement Order and Denial of Legal Aid for Individual with Schizophrenia
Procedural provision cited in the reasoning section establishing the jurisdiction for appeals against ZMG decisions, which sets the stage for the review leading to the dismissal of the appeal in point 1.
C1 24 121 · vs (Art. 114 al. 2 LACC)
Mother Granted De Facto Custody; Father's Visitation Modified
Cited in reasoning regarding jurisdiction, but not in the final orders 1-4.
C1 25 36 · vs (Art. 314 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 450a Abs. 2 und Art. 450b Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 20 Abs. 3 RPflG; Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 und Abs. 2 EGZGB)
Father's Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Dismissed; Jurisdiction Confirmed.
These provisions establish the right to appeal against denial or delay of action by the child protection authority, which forms the basis for reviewing the case.
C1 25 3 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 und 2 EGZGB)
Appeal Regarding Replacement of Asset Management Guardian with Professional Fiduciary
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competence of the court.
C1 24 220 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 Ziff. 2 und 3 EGZGB)
KESB Decision Upheld: Child Placement in Closed Facility Affirmed
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to appeal against decisions on placement.
C1 24 80 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 lettre c chiffre 3 LACC)
In re Commitment of A.B.
Cited regarding the jurisdiction of the single judge of the Cantonal Tribunal to rule on the appeal against the decision on placement for assistance.
C1 23 176 · vs (Art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 et al. 2 LACC)
Custody and Schooling Location Dispute Over Stability of Children's Ties
Cited regarding the competence of the single judge of the Cantonal Tribunal for appeals against child protection authority decisions.
C1 22 289 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 2 et al. 2 LACC)
Maternal Authority's Decision on Child Placement Overturned for Lack of Oral Hearing
This provision is cited to establish the jurisdiction for the appeal against the provisional decision (although the main ground of the final order is the violation of the right to be heard).
C1 22 142 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 LACC)
Appeal Against Representation Curatorship Based on Insufficient Medical Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to establish the cantonal court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
C1 22 142 · vs (art. 114 al. 2 LACC)
Appeal Against Representation Curatorship Based on Insufficient Medical Evaluation
Cited in the reasoning to establish that the appeal could be decided by a single judge.
C1 21 294 · vs (Art. 114 Abs. 1 lit. c Ziff. 4 sowie Abs. 2, Art. 117 Abs. 3 EGZGB)
Father's Appeal Against Continued Out-of-Home Placement for Daughter Dismissed
Cited as part of the procedural rules establishing the admissibility and legitimacy of the appeal to the Cantonal Court.
C1 22 154 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 3 LACC)
Commitment for Assistance of Patient with Bipolar Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder Upheld
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of the judge for coercive measures.
C1 22 98 · vs (art. 114 al. 1 let. c ch. 4 LACC)
Biological Father's Post-Adoption Contact Request Denied Due to Prior Consent and Child's Best Interests
Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against protection authority decisions.