Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 36 Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar)

Dépens - Honoraires du conseil juridique en matière pénale
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (47 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 36 LTar

1. En cas de procédure devant l'autorité pénale, les honoraires sont fixé comme il suit

a) devant le tribunal de police de 250 à 650 francs;

b) devant la police, dans la procédure d'investigation (avocat de la première heure) de 250 à 1'600 francs;

c) devant le ministère public comme autorité de conciliation de 60 à 1'100 francs;

d) devant le ministère public pour les autres procédures de 550 à 5'500 francs,

e) devant le tribunal des mesures de contrainte de 550 à 3'300 francs;

f) devant le tribunal de district de 550 à 3'300 francs;

g) devant le tribunal d'arrondissement de 1'100 à 8'800 francs;

h) devant le juge ou le tribunal des mineurs, en première instance de 550 à 3'300 francs;

i) devant le tribunal des mineurs, en appel de 550 à 5'500 francs;

j) devant le Tribunal cantonal, en appel et en révision de 1'100 à 8'800 francs;

k) devant un juge du Tribunal cantonal ou la chambre pénale, en recours de 300 à 2'200 francs;

l) devant le tribunal de l'application des peines et mesures et dans les procédures d'autres affaires judiciaires pénales au sens de la loi d'application code pénal suisse de 300 à 2'200 francs.

← Art. 35 LTar Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar) - Champ d'application Art. 37 LTar →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (27)

P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 36 Abs. 1 lit. d GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 2.4) to establish the applicable hourly rate framework for calculating the party compensation awarded in dispositive order 3.
P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 3.2) to establish the applicable fee framework for setting the party compensation awarded in dispositive order 5.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 36 lit. j GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for the applicable fee range for an attorney's lump-sum fee in the appeal before the Cantonal Court.
P3 24 260 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance of Misappropriation Case Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence and Contradictory Statements
Cited to specify the range for setting the lawyer's fee in appeal proceedings before the appeal instance.
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited in the reasoning (5.4.2) to establish the range for determining the amount of party compensation for the appeal procedure.
P3 24 108 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Complainants' Appeal Against Prosecutor's Decision Not to Investigate Several Allegations Upheld in Part
Cited in the reasoning for determining the range of the party compensation, which was confirmed in the dispositive.
P1 23 107 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Appeal Regarding Conviction, Sentence, and Damages in Attempted Rape and Drug Case
Used in the reasoning to determine the amount of party compensation for the defense counsel (Ruppen and Sarbach) in the appeal.
P2 22 48 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Pre-trial Detention Ordered Due to High Flight Risk Following Sentence Increase
Cited in the reasoning to establish the typical fee ranges for legal representation at various procedural stages.
P3 24 23 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Heirs v. Public Prosecutor (Death Following Fall at Public Toilet)
Cited in the reasoning to set the range for the party compensation (Parteientschädigung) in appeal proceedings.
P1 22 140 · vs (art. 36 al. 1 let. d, e et g LTar)
Prosecutor's Appeal Upheld, Sentence Increased; Defense Fee Appeal Rejected
Cited in reasoning regarding fee maxima, which is relevant to the fee fixation upheld in the final order (Art. 10).
P1 20 74 · vs (art. 36 let. j LTar)
Appeal Regarding Gross Traffic Violations, Negligent Bodily Harm, and Imprisonment for Dangerous Driving
The court set the compensation amount for the private parties for the appeal proceedings based on this tariff provision.
P3 23 98 · vs (Art. 36 lit. k GTar)
Appeal Against Seizure of Funds Related to Drug Trafficking
Applied to determine the amount of the fixed compensation for the official defense counsel.
P1 22 97 · vs (Art. 36 lit. j GTar)
Prosecutor's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing and Insufficient Reasoning
Cited in the reasoning to determine the standard fee range for lawyer's fees in criminal appeals before the Cantonal Court.
P3 22 126 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Defense Attorney Fee Appeal in Fraudulent Bankruptcy Case
Cited to justify exceeding the statutory upper limit for the official remuneration (Fr. 5'500.00) due to special circumstances.
P3 22 69 · vs (Art. 36 GTar)
Prosecutor's Suspension of Criminal Proceedings Overruled Due to Unreasonable Delay
Cited to determine the range for calculating the party compensation for the appeal procedure.