Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 22 Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar) - Autres procédures

Frais - Emolument - En matière pénale
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (47 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 22 LTar · Autres procédures

1. Pour les autres causes pénales, il est perçu un émolument de

a) * 40 à 1'200 francs pour la procédure de conciliation devant le ministère public;

b) * 90 à 6'000 francs pour les autres procédures devant le ministère public;

c) * 90 à 2'400 francs pour la procédure devant le tribunal de district;

d) * 190 à 6'000 francs pour la procédure devant le tribunal d'arrondissement;

e) * 90 à 1'200 francs pour la procédure devant le tribunal des mesures de contrainte;

f) * 380 à 6'000 francs pour la procédure d'appel ou de révision devant le Tribunal cantonal;

g) * 90 à 2'400 francs pour la procédure de recours devant la chambre pénale du Tribunal cantonal ou un juge du Tribunal cantonal et jusqu'à 6'600 francs en matière d'entraide judiciaire internationale;

h) * 90 à 1'200 francs pour la procédure devant le tribunal de l'application des peines et mesures et dans les procédures d'autres affaires judiciaires pénales au sens de la loi d'application du code pénal suisse.

← Art. 21 LTar Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar) - Champ d'application Art. 23 LTar →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (71)

P3 25 13 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Appeal Regarding Dismissal of Criminal Proceedings and Compensation for Wrongful Custody
Cited in the reasoning (point 3.1) to establish the applicable range for the court fee allocated in dispositive order 4.
P1 23 160 · vs (art. 13 et 22 let. f LTar)
Appellant v. State: Consumption of High-THC Cannabis vs. Minimal Quantity Exception
Used to set the amount of the appeal procedure costs.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. b GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the preliminary procedure.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. c GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the main procedure before the District Court.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 22 Abs. 1 lit. f GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee for the appeal concerning the defense counsel's indemnity.
A3 24 19 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Owners Fined for Unauthorized Building Use Despite Expired Permit Appeal Window
Cited in relation to the fixing of the procedural costs.
P3 24 260 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Prosecutor's Discontinuance of Misappropriation Case Overturned Due to Insufficient Evidence and Contradictory Statements
Cited to specify the range for setting the court fee in appeal proceedings before a Cantonal Court judge.
P3 24 194 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Appeal Dismissed: Denial of Conditional Release for Convicted Sex Offender
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicable fee range, but not explicitly in the final orders.
P1 22 100 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Appeal Court Upholds Conviction for Sexual Misconduct Against Cousin
Range of fees for appeal proceedings.
A1 24 118 · vs (art. 22 al. 1 let. f LTar)
Inmate Disciplinary Sanctions Appeal: Right to be Heard and Proportionality of Penalties
Cited in the reasoning section (Considerant 5.3) regarding the fee limits, but not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders 1-5. Therefore, excluded.
P1 23 119 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Narcotics Trafficking Sentence Reduction and Fee Re-evaluation
Article applied to determine the basis for calculating the allocation of costs in the context of the cantonal tariff.
P2 22 48 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Pre-trial Detention Ordered Due to High Flight Risk Following Sentence Increase
Cited analogously to set the court fee based on the complexity and nature of the case.
P1 23 142 · vs (Art. 22 lit. f GTar)
Appeal Against Deportation Order Following Theft Conviction
Used to determine the amount of the court fee (Gerichtsgebühr) for the appeal proceedings.
P3 24 23 · vs (Art. 22 lit. g GTar)
Heirs v. Public Prosecutor (Death Following Fall at Public Toilet)
Cited in the reasoning to set the range for the court fee in appeal proceedings.
P1 22 59 · vs (art. 22 let. f LTar)
Motorcyclist Overtaking Moped Turning at Intersection: Reclassification of Serious Traffic Violation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the appeal fee scale, but not explicitly in the final orders 1-4.