Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.8 GTARLTAR CH-VS

Art. 14 Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar) - Réduction ou renonciation

Frais - Emolument - Généralités
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (47 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 14 LTar · Réduction ou renonciation

1. Lorsque la cause n'est pas conduite jusqu'à son terme, l'émolument est réduit proportionnellement. Il en va de même en cas de jugement sur le fond préjudiciel ou partiel, de jugement par défaut ou sans motivation.

2. L'autorité peut renoncer, à titre exceptionnel, à percevoir tout ou partie de l'émolument.

← Art. 13 LTar Loi fixant le tarif des frais et dépens devant les autorités judiciaires ou administratives (LTar) - Champ d'application Art. 15 LTar →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (110)

C1 25 22 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 GTar)
Divorce Appeal Moot Due to Spouse's Death Before Final Judgment
Applied to waive the court fee for the appeal procedure exceptionally.
C1 24 176 · vs (art. 14 al. 2 LTar)
Heir's Appeal Challenging Payment Modalities of Curator Fees Inadmissible
The court cited this article when deciding exceptionally to waive the collection of costs in its final orders.
C1 25 101 · vs (art. 14 al. 2 LTar)
Cantonal Court Decision on Costs and Legal Fees After Federal Tribunal Ruling
Cited as the basis for not collecting court fees for the present decision (the final ruling).
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for determining the court fee based on the cost coverage and equivalence principle.
P1 24 142 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 GTar)
Riot and Assault Conviction Appeals with Counsel Fee Review
Cited for reducing the court fee for the appeal concerning the defense counsel's indemnity.
C1 25 99 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 GTar)
In re Welfare Placement Order and Denial of Legal Aid for Individual with Schizophrenia
Justifies the exceptional waiver of court fees, as ordered in point 3 of the final orders.
A1 25 8 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 GTar)
Hospital Authority v. State Council (Administrative Appeal Dismissed as Settled)
Cited to justify the reduction of the court fee because the procedure was not concluded until the end.
C1 25 83 · vs (art. 14 al. 2 LTar)
Bipolar Patient's Appeal of Involuntary Commitment Denied Due to Psychosis and Self-Endangerment Risk
Cited as the basis for the exceptional decision not to charge judicial costs.
A1 23 177 · vs (art. 14 al. 1 LTar)
Employee Termination Appeal Withdrawn Following Settlement: Costs Awarded to Withdrawing Party
Cited regarding the proportional reduction of the court fee due to the case not proceeding to a final ruling.
F1 24 161 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 1 GTar)
Tax Liability Paid, Appeal Moot, Costs Assigned
Cited to justify a reduced court fee due to the early termination of the procedure.
C1 24 215 · vs (art. 14 al. 2 LTar)
Appeal Against Immediate Withdrawal of Parental Residence Rights Due to Isolated Neglect Incident
Used to decide on the waiver of judicial costs (order 4).
C1 25 36 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 GTar)
Father's Appeal Against Child Protection Authority Dismissed; Jurisdiction Confirmed.
This provision was used in the reasoning to justify the exceptional waiver of court fees, which is applied in Order 4.
C1 25 3 · vs (Art. 14 Abs. 2 GTar)
Appeal Regarding Replacement of Asset Management Guardian with Professional Fiduciary
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility for the authority to waive the fee.
F1 25 8 · vs (art. 14 al. 1 et 25 LTar)
Limited Liability Company v. Tax Authority: Untimely Appeal Due to Managing Associate's Incapacitation
Cited in the context of establishing the amount of costs imposed on the appellant.
F1 25 3 · vs (Art. 14 al. 1 LTar)
Tax Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Late Filing
Cited in the context of imposing costs upon the unsuccessful appellant.