172.6 VVRGLPJA

CH-VS

Art. 88 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Frais a) En général

Frais et dépens

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (114 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 88 LPJA · Frais a) En général

1. Celui qui provoque ou requiert une démarche de l'administration acquitte l'émolument fixé par l'autorité. Il peut être tenu de rembourser tout ou partie des débours.

2. Si plusieurs parties ont procédé conjointement, elles répondent solidairement des frais sous réserve d'une décision contraire de l'autorité. Il en va de même en cas de représentation commune (art. 11a) et de jonction des causes (art. 11b).

3. ...

4. Les débours comprennent notamment les honoraires des experts, les indemnités aux témoins et les autres dépenses nécessitées par l'instruction.

5. Celui qui provoque des frais inutiles est tenu de les supporter dans chaque cas, même s'il obtient gain de cause.

6. Si l'administration de preuves entraîne des frais relativement élevés, l'autorité peut subordonner l'admission des preuves à la condition que la partie avance les frais dans le délai qui lui est imparti.

← Art. 87a LPJA Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Principes Art. 89 LPJA →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (180)

F1 24 124 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Appeal Regarding 2018 Assessment: Undisclosed Distributions, Loan Disallowance, and Share Valuation

Cited in the dispositive for setting the final amount of the reduced court costs.

A1 24 126 · vs (Art. 88 Abs. 5 VVRG)

Bid Challenge Regarding Plastering Contract Award Dismissed

Cited as the basis for ordering the administrative authority to bear part of the costs due to incomplete document submission.

A1 24 220 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Concerning Communal Importance Classification and Subsidy Request

This provision governs the allocation of costs, which the dispositive orders to be borne by the appellants.

S1 25 64 · vs (Art. 88 Abs. 1 VVRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Refusal to Waive Recovery of Overpaid Unemployment Benefits Due to Gross Negligence

Cited as part of the legal basis determining that the appeal procedure is subject to costs because it does not concern a benefit dispute.

F1 24 117 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Deduction for Wealthy Adult Children

Cited in the context of imposing court costs.

A1 24 122 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Against Car Shelter Demolition Order and Procedural Violations

Applied to confirm the solidarity between the appellants for the payment of the judicial costs.

F1 24 108 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Property Owner Challenges Imputed Rental Value Assessment Based on Market Rate Disparity

Cited in the reasoning for the costs order (which is reflected in order 3).

A1 24 174 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)

Appeal Against Refusal to Regularize Unauthorized Agricultural Building and Demolition Order Dismissed

This provision dictates the allocation of court costs following the rejection of the appeal.

A1 24 171 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Access to Internal Service Reports Under Transparency Law

Provision used to establish joint and several liability for the appellants concerning the court costs of the current procedure.

A1 25 39 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)

Traffic Offense License Withdrawal Interpretation Appeal

Provision applied to determine that the costs of the proceedings are charged to the appellant.

A1 24 143 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 5 LPJA)

Neighbors v. Municipality (Underground Garage Permit and Servitude Dispute)

Applied to determine the distribution of court costs (3/4 to the appellants).

A1 24 210 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Against Construction Permit Annulled for Procedural Defects and Insufficient Reasoning

Used to establish the joint liability of A_________ and C_________ for the court fees.

F1 24 90 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 LPJA)

Taxpayer Legal Fees Deductibility for Non-Income Related Proceedings

Cited in the order regarding the imposition of costs.

A1 24 123 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 5 et art. 89 al. 4 LPJA)

Construction Permit Appeal Affirmation with Cost Apportionment

Provisions applied to allocate half of the costs to the appellants due to their partial success regarding procedural rights.

A1 24 99 · vs (art. 88 al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA ; art. 3 al. 3, 11, 13 al. 1 et 25 LTar)

Neighboring Owners v. Canton on Building Permit for Six Villas

Provisions cited for imposing the case costs on the appellants.