172.6 VVRGLPJA

CH-VS

Art. 81a Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Compétence

La juridiction du Tribunal cantonal - Le Tribunal cantonal comme autorité de recours - Juridiction de droit fiscal et des assurances sociales

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (114 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 81a LPJA · Compétence

1. Le Tribunal cantonal connaît, en instance unique, des recours dans le domaine fiscal et des assurances sociales.

2. Sous réserve des dispositions spéciales de la législation fédérale et cantonale, la procédure devant la juridiction de droit administratif s'applique par analogie.

3. Toutefois, la Cour de droit fiscal et la Cour des assurances sociales ne sont pas liées par les conclusions des parties. Elles peuvent réformer la décision au détriment du recourant ou lui accorder plus que requis; elles doivent cependant donner aux parties l'occasion de se prononcer ou de retirer le recours.

← Art. 81 LPJA Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Principes Art. 82 LPJA →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (70)

S2 24 23 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 et 91 al. 1 et 2 a contrario LPJA)

Tinnitus Causation for Psychological Impairment and Benefit Reassessment

Cited in conjunction with art. 61 let. g LPGA to justify awarding costs to the appellant against the respondent.

S1 23 199 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 LPJA)

Appeals Regarding Supplementary Benefit Calculation Based on Presumed Cohabitation and Apartment Rent Sharing

Cité en lien avec l'art. 61 let. g LPGA pour justifier l'octroi des dépens.

S1 23 130 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Regarding Revised Social Security Contribution Assessments Upheld

Cited regarding the applicability of cantonal procedural rules and the court's duty to seek conciliation if applicable.

S1 24 52 · vs (art. 81a al. 1 LPJA)

Carpenter-Turned-Draftsman Disability Appeal Upheld

Cited in the reasoning leading to the finding of the competent instance (though the decision itself does not explicitly cite it in the dispositive orders 1-3).

S1 24 4 · vs (art. 81a al. 1 LPJA)

Claimant v. Unemployment Fund: Exclusion of Work Device Value from Intermediate Earnings for Benefit Calculation

Cited in the reasoning to confirm jurisdiction, which supports the final orders.

S1 23 80 · vs (art. 81a al. 1 LPJA)

Unemployment Benefits Restitution Good Faith Reversal

Cited as part of the legal basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the case.

S1 23 80 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 et 91 al. 1 et 2 a contrario LPJA)

Unemployment Benefits Restitution Good Faith Reversal

Cited as the procedural basis for awarding costs and expenses to the appellant.

S3 25 27 · vs (Art. 81a al. 1 loi cantonale sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives [LPJA])

Applicant v. Insurer (Psychiatrist Designation Dispute)

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the proper jurisdiction for lodging the appeal.

S1 23 192 · vs (Art. 81a al. 2 LPJA)

Appellant Denied Full Disability Pension Despite Multiple Impairments

Cited in the reasoning supporting the final order concerning the costs imposed on the appellant.

S1 23 18 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 LPJA)

Minor Diabetic's Incapacity Allowance Appeal Remanded for Reassessment of Intensive Care Needs

Cited alongside cantonal law provisions concerning the right to costs and expenses in the appeal procedure.

S3 24 22 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 LPJA)

Appeal Granted for Legal Aid in Unemployment Benefit Repayment Case

Cited in connection with the order for costs to be borne by the respondent (Caisse cantonale de chômage).

S1 24 69 · vs (art. 81a al. 1 LPJA)

Manager Held Personally Liable for Unpaid Social Security Contributions Despite Bankruptcy

Cited in conjunction with procedural rules regarding the competent authority for the appeal.

S2 23 78 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 et 91 al. 1 et 2 a contrario LPJA)

Pension Benefits Based on Statutory Disability Determination

Cited as the procedural basis for awarding costs to the successful claimant.

S1 23 57 · vs (art. 81a al. 2 et 89 al. 1 LPJA)

Claimant's Appeal of Denied Disability Benefits Rejected Due to Surveillance-Evidenced Simulation

Cited for charging the costs of the procedure to the appellant who lost the appeal.

S2 23 102 · vs (art. 81a al. 1 LPJA)

Skier's Patellar Dislocation Not Covered as Accident Due to Pre-existing Condition

Cited as part of the formal admissibility review, although the actual decision did not depend on it.