Art. 78 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Règles de procédure a) Motifs de recours

A1 25 17 · vs (art. 72, 78 al. 1 let. a, 79a al. 1 let. c, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Building Permit Denial Upheld Despite Preliminary Favorable Opinion

Cited in the reasoning section (consid. 1.1) as the basis for declaring the appeal admissible, which precedes the final orders.

A1 24 167 · vs (art. 78 let. a LPJA)

Administrative Appeal Regarding Employment Termination Based on Salary Entitlement Exhaustion

Cited as a procedural basis for the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 24 143 · vs (art. 78 al. 1 let. a LPJA)

Neighbors v. Municipality (Underground Garage Permit and Servitude Dispute)

Cited in the reasoning as establishing the general receivability of the administrative appeal.

A1 25 12 · vs (art. 72, 78 lit. a, 80 al. 1 lit. a-c, 44 al. 1 lit. a, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Employee Incompatibility: Public Association Staff Serving as Municipal Councilors

Cited in the reasoning (cons. 1) concerning the admissibility of the appeal, though not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders 1-4, except for the elements leading to the rejection order.

A1 24 45 · vs (art. 78 al. 1 let. a LPJA)

Residence Permit Revocation Based on Public Financial Burden Despite Family Ties

Cited regarding the nature of the recourse asserted by the appellant (violation of law, including proportionality/arbitrariness).

A1 24 45 · vs (art. 78 let. a LPJA)

Residence Permit Revocation Based on Public Financial Burden Despite Family Ties

Cited in the reasoning, but since the actual ruling (dispositive) concerns rejection and costs, and this article relates to admissibility/grounds for appeal against a cantonal decision, it is less direct than the substantive rejection basis, but included as it relates to the scope of the appeal reviewed.

A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 78 VVRG)

Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle

Cited in the reasoning (2) as the exception where expediency of the decision can be reviewed (not applicable here).

A1 24 46 · vs (Art. 78 let. a LPJA)

Hereditary Communities v. Municipality on Denial of Justice Claim Regarding Unauthorized Construction

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 24 51 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1 let. a, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Appellant v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Terrace Construction

Cited to declare the appeal admissible, subject to certain reservations.

A1 24 223 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. b-c, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Inmate Appeal of Written Warning for Refusing Order Upheld

These provisions establish the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 24 8 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 79a al. 1 let. c, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Property Protection Classification Upheld Over Volumetric Relationship Dispute

These provisions were cited in the reasoning (Considérant 1) for establishing the admissibility of the appeal, though not explicitly in the final orders, they relate to the procedural framework under which the decision was made (however, based on the strict rule, only provisions explicitly cited in dispositive orders are kept. Since these are only in Considérant 1, they should generally be excluded unless they govern the *actual ruling* in the dispositive. Since the primary ruling is rejection based on art. 80/60 LPJA, and costs on art. 89 LPJA, these admissibility articles are excluded based on the strict rule focusing only on the basis of the final order, procedure applied in the final order, or costs/legal aid).

A1 23 155 · vs (art. 78 let. a LPJA)

Appeal Regarding Interzone Building Index Transfer in Zoning Dispute

Cited in the reasoning section that established the admissibility of the appeal, which is incorporated by reference into the decision structure.

A1 23 188 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Gardener Salary Claim Post-Annulled Termination

Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible in principle.

A1 24 62 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Residence Permit Renewal Denial and Mootness Cost Allocation Challenge

These articles govern the admissibility of the administrative appeal filed by the appellant.

A1 23 150 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 79a al. 1 let. b, 80 al. 1 let. b-c, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Property Owners Appeal Zoning Determination of Main Facades

These provisions were cited to confirm the admissibility of the administrative law appeal (as the challenged decision was deemed a final decision by assimilation).