Art. 72 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Compétence

A1 25 17 · vs (art. 72, 78 al. 1 let. a, 79a al. 1 let. c, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Building Permit Denial Upheld Despite Preliminary Favorable Opinion

Cited in the reasoning section (consid. 1.1) as the basis for declaring the appeal admissible, which precedes the final orders.

A1 25 64 · vs (art. 72 et 77 let. a, 5 al. 2, 41 al. 1 et 2 et 42 let. e LPJA)

Municipality Appeal Against Interim Decision Lifting Use Prohibition Inadmissible Due to Lack of Irreparable Harm

These provisions concerning the separability of appeals against interlocutory decisions were cited in the reasoning examining the admissibility of the appeal.

A1 24 135 · vs (Art. 72, 80 al. 1 let. a à c, 44, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Revocation of Residency for Long-Term Social Assistance Recipient Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to establish the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 25 39 · vs (art. 72, 80 al. 1 let. a et b, 44 let. a et 46 LPJA)

Traffic Offense License Withdrawal Interpretation Appeal

Cited to confirm the admissibility of the administrative appeal under specific procedural conditions.

A1 25 25 · vs (art. 72, 80 al. 1 lit. a, c, d, 44 al. 1 lit. a, 46, 48 LPJA ; art. 26 al. 1 et 3, 54 al. 3 LACP)

Inmate v. Sanctions and Accompaniment Measures Office (OSAMA) on Dental Care Coverage

Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal.

A1 24 130 · vs (art. 72, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Municipality Tax Exemption Procedural Error Appeal

Provisions used to declare the administrative appeal admissible.

A1 25 12 · vs (art. 72, 78 lit. a, 80 al. 1 lit. a-c, 44 al. 1 lit. a, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Employee Incompatibility: Public Association Staff Serving as Municipal Councilors

Cited in the reasoning (cons. 1) concerning the admissibility of the appeal, though not explicitly repeated in the dispositive orders 1-4, except for the elements leading to the rejection order.

A1 24 224 · vs (art. 72, 80 al. 1 let. b-c, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Perimeter Ban and Reporting Obligation Upheld After Violent Police Confrontation

Cited in the reasoning (point 1) to confirm that the formal requirements for admissibility, including the deadline, were met.

A1 24 72 · vs (Art. 72 VVRG)

Weapons Confiscation Upheld Due to Psychiatric Risk Assessment

Cited as establishing that the decision of the Council of State constitutes a final decision subject to administrative court appeal.

A1 24 51 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1 let. a, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Appellant v. Municipality: Building Permit Denial and Terrace Construction

Cited to declare the appeal admissible, subject to certain reservations.

A1 24 223 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. b-c, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Inmate Appeal of Written Warning for Refusing Order Upheld

These provisions establish the admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 24 8 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 79a al. 1 let. c, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Property Protection Classification Upheld Over Volumetric Relationship Dispute

These provisions were cited in the reasoning (Considérant 1) for establishing the admissibility of the appeal, though not explicitly in the final orders, they relate to the procedural framework under which the decision was made (however, based on the strict rule, only provisions explicitly cited in dispositive orders are kept. Since these are only in Considérant 1, they should generally be excluded unless they govern the *actual ruling* in the dispositive. Since the primary ruling is rejection based on art. 80/60 LPJA, and costs on art. 89 LPJA, these admissibility articles are excluded based on the strict rule focusing only on the basis of the final order, procedure applied in the final order, or costs/legal aid).

A1 24 54 · vs (art. 72, 80 al. 1 let. a, b, c LPJA)

Administrative Law Appeal Dismissed: Construction Permit Validity Upheld

Cited in consideration 1.3 as the basis for deeming the appeal admissible after examining the grounds.

A1 24 133 · vs (art. 72 et 80 al. 1 let. b LPJA)

Appeal Regarding Suspension of Prison Sentence for Sexual Coercion Denied on Grounds of Mootness and Lack of Serious Grounds

These articles were cited in the reasoning to establish the initial admissibility of the administrative appeal.

A1 23 188 · vs (art. 72, 78 let. a, 80 al. 1 let. a-c, 44 al. 1, 46 et 48 LPJA)

Gardener Salary Claim Post-Annulled Termination

Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible in principle.