Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
172.6 VVRGLPJA CH-VS

Art. 51 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Effet suspensif

La procédure de recours devant les autorités administratives - Effets du recours et instructions
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (114 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 51 LPJA · Effet suspensif

1. Le recours a effet suspensif.

2. Sauf si elle porte sur une prestation pécuniaire, la décision de l'autorité inférieure peut, pour de justes motifs, retirer totalement ou partiellement l'effet suspensif d'un éventuel recours. L'autorité de recours, ou son président s'il s'agit d'un collège, a le même droit après le dépôt du recours.

3. L'autorité de recours, ou son président, peut d'office ou sur demande restituer l'effet suspensif à un recours auquel l'autorité inférieure l'avait retiré.

4. Lorsque le retrait de l'effet suspensif résulte de la décision au fond, la demande de restitution ne peut être formulée qu'avec le recours contre cette décision ou postérieurement. Cette demande ou le recours séparé contre la décision incidente de refus ou de retrait de l'effet suspensif n'ont pas d'effet suspensif et doivent être traités sans délai.

5. Si, d'une part, l'effet suspensif est arbitrairement retiré ou si, d'autre part, une demande d'effet suspensif ou un recours séparé contre la décision incidente de refus ou de retrait de l'effet suspensif sont arbitrairement rejetés ou traités tardivement, la collectivité ou l'établissement autonome au nom de qui l'autorité a statué répond du dommage qui en résulte.

← Art. 50 LPJA Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Principes Art. 53 LPJA →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (16)

A1 24 143 · vs (art. 51 al. 1 LPJA)
Neighbors v. Municipality (Underground Garage Permit and Servitude Dispute)
Cited in the reasoning to state that the request for suspensive effect was obsolete due to automatic effect.
A1 24 127 · vs (art. 51 et 80 al. 1 let. d LPJA)
Property Owner v. Municipality on Municipal Reserved Zone for Land Use Readjustment
Cited in connection with the principle that the special rule (art. 19 al. 1 in fine LcAT) overrides the general rule regarding automatic suspensive effect for administrative appeals.
S1 22 132 · vs (art. 51 al. 1 LPJA)
Appeal Dismissed for COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Compensation and Repayment Obligation
Cited in relation to the suspensive effect of the appeal, although the request was deemed moot.
A1 23 145 · vs (art. 51 al. 1 LPJA)
Barn Conversion Permit Appeal Regarding Noise and Residency Compliance
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal having suspensive effect ex lege, making the conclusion on this point obsolete.
A1 22 147 · vs (art. 51 al. 2 LPJA)
Appeal Inadmissible: Revocation of Lakeside Concession Following Property Sale
Cited in the dispositive order 1 in connection with the classification of the request to withdraw the suspensive effect.
A1 21 271 · vs (art. 51 al. 2 ss et 80 al. 1 lit. d LPJA)
Chalet Enlargement Permit Access Dispute
Cited regarding the classification of the request for a suspensive effect.
A2 21 57 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VVRG)
Owner's Appeal Against Denial of Suspensive Effect for Site Remediation Order
The court dismissed the appeal, referencing this article in the context of declining to reinstate the suspensive effect, which was the subject of the appeal.
A1 21 76 · vs (art. 51 al. 2 LPJA)
Judicial Review of Arson Convict's Facility Placement
Mentioned to reject the appellant's first ground of appeal concerning the violation of rules on suspensive effect.
A1 21 31 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VVRG)
Business Suspension Over Collective Bargaining Agreement Compliance in Public Contracts
The provision defining the general rule that an administrative appeal has suspensive effect, which the court reinstated.
A2 20 68 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Municipality Upheld in Denying Stay of Material Management Stoppage Based on Public Safety
This procedural provision on the reinstatement of the suspensive effect by the appeal instance was discussed, but the overall request under this framework was ultimately rejected.
A1 19 214 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 1 VVRG)
Litigant v. School Board Regarding Recusal and Failing Grades
Cited in point 6.4 regarding the general suspensive effect of an administrative appeal.
A1 19 214 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 2 VVRG)
Litigant v. School Board Regarding Recusal and Failing Grades
Cited in point 6.4 and 6.7 to discuss the conditions under which the lower authority can withdraw the suspensive effect, which the court found to be absent.
A1 19 214 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 3 VVRG)
Litigant v. School Board Regarding Recusal and Failing Grades
Cited in the procedural request by the appellant, and the court's reasoning discusses the suspension of effect (aufschiebende Wirkung) in relation to this article in point 6.4 ff.
A1 19 214 · vs (Art. 51 Abs. 5 VVRG)
Litigant v. School Board Regarding Recusal and Failing Grades
Cited in point 6.8 regarding liability for damages if the suspensive effect is arbitrarily withdrawn.
A1 14 11 · vs (art. 51 al. 1 LPJA)
Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Concrete Interest Following Annulment of Building Permits
Cited regarding the effect of suspending the contested decision, which became moot due to inadmissibility.