172.6
VVRGLPJA
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 46 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Délais
La procédure de recours devant les autorités administratives - Délais, motifs et mémoire de recours
Art. 46 LPJA · Délais
1. Le recours est déposé dans les 30 jours ou, s'il s'agit d'une décision incidente (art. 41 et 42), dans les dix jours dès la notification de la décision.
2. Les délais différents prévus par la législation cantonale antérieure sont abolis, sauf en matière d'élections et de votations.
3. Les articles 14 alinéa 2 et 34 alinéa 1 sont réservés.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (48)
A1 24 117 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Building Permit Appeal Regarding Parking Servitude
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.5) to confirm that the appeal was filed in time and in the required form.
A1 25 42 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Appeal Dismissed for Improper Electronic Filing
The court did not enter upon the appeal because it was neither filed within the time limit nor in the proper form.
A1 24 143 · vs (art. 46 al. 1 LPJA)
Neighbors v. Municipality (Underground Garage Permit and Servitude Dispute)
Cited in the reasoning as establishing the general receivability of the administrative appeal.
A1 24 96 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Property Owners' Association Appeal Regarding Road Resurfacing as Material Expropriation
Cited in the reasoning section to confirm the admissibility of the appeal before dismissing it.
A1 24 72 · vs (Art. 46 VVRG)
Weapons Confiscation Upheld Due to Psychiatric Risk Assessment
Cited as part of the procedural basis for entering into the appeal (timeliness).
A1 24 27 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Water Protection Zone Width Dispute
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.4) to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and timeliness, which underpins the decision to hear the case, but not directly cited in the operative part (dispositive).
A1 24 3 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Construction Company Challenge to Administrative Road Renovation Bid Scoring Upheld
Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and deadline.
A1 23 172 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Administrative Appeal Dismissal Upheld Due to Untimely Initial Filing Against Land Registry Denial
Used to rule on the admissibility (entry into procedure) of the appeal based on procedural requirements.
A1 23 134 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Appeal Against Building Permit Revocation Dismissed
Cited to confirm that the appeal was admissible regarding form and deadlines.
A1 23 184 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Ski Accident Victim Compensation Appeal
Used to confirm that the appeal was admissible based on compliance with procedural requirements regarding form and timeliness.
A1 23 132 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Employee Disciplinary Warning Upheld Despite Due Process and Prescription Arguments
Used in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
A1 23 82 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Telecommunications Providers v. Municipality on Mobile Antenna Siting Regulations
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal on formal and timely grounds, a procedural prerequisite for the decision.
A1 22 92 · vs (art. 72 de la loi du 6 octobre 1976 sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives [LPJA ; RS/VS 172.6] et art. 46 et 48 LPJA, applicables par renvoi de l’art. 80 al. 1 LPJA)
Foreign Company Real Estate Acquisition Exemption Appeal
These procedural rules were cited in the reasoning section to confirm the admissibility of the appeal based on the recognized capacity to appeal by the OFJ when the SAIC renounces an appeal.
A1 22 148 · vs (Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Indemnity Dispute Over Zoning Revision Mootness and Right to Be Heard
Procedural provisions cited regarding the admissibility and formality of the appeal.
A1 22 148 · vs (Art. 80 Abs. 1 lit. b und c i.V.m. Art. 46 und Art. 48 VVRG)
Cantonal Council Indemnity Dispute Over Zoning Revision Mootness and Right to Be Heard
Procedural basis for admitting the appeal.