172.6
VVRGLPJA
CH-VS
CH-VS
Art. 34m Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Procédure d'appel
La procédure devant les autorités administratives - Procédure de réclamation - En droit pénal administratif
Art. 34m LPJA · Procédure d'appel
1. La procédure d'appel est régie par le code de procédure pénale suisse sous réserve des dispositions suivantes
a) seul le condamné a qualité pour appeler;
b) la déclaration d'appel doit être déposée dans les 30 jours dès la notification du prononcé auprès du juge compétent;
c) le juge compétent communique la déclaration d'appel à l'administration en lui impartissant un délai pour produire le dossier de la cause et ses observations qui sont portées à la connaissance du recourant avec un délai pour se déterminer;
d) il complète l'instruction lorsqu'il l'estime utile;
e) il peut statuer sans débats avec l'accord de l'appelant;
f) il peut confirmer ou atténuer le prononcé.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (44)
A3 24 25 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG)
Building Fine Appeal: Procedural Defects and Remand for Insufficient Specification of Charges
Used in conjunction with procedural articles to rule on the appeal (specifically regarding costs and procedure, though the main operative part is Art. 329 Abs. 2 StPO).
A3 24 15 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG)
Corporation's Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Formal Conviction Under Cantonal Law
The decision to not enter upon the appeal is based on the grounds stated in Art. 34m VVRG (specifically Art. 34m Abs. 1 lit. a, which was extensively discussed regarding the appellant's standing).
A3 24 15 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG i.V.m. Art. 398 ff. StPO)
Corporation's Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Formal Conviction Under Cantonal Law
Cited in the introduction as the legal basis for the Single Judge's authority to rule in this appeal proceeding.
A3 24 15 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG i.V.m. Art. 422 Abs. 1 StPO)
Corporation's Appeal Dismissed Due to Lack of Formal Conviction Under Cantonal Law
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the definition and composition of procedural costs in the appeal proceedings.
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited throughout the reasoning as the provision governing the appeal procedure before the Cantonal Court, relevant to the decision on costs (5.3.2) and compensation (5.4.1).
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 34m lit. a VVRG)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited in the reasoning (1.2.3) to confirm the standing of the appellants to file an appeal.
A3 24 13 · vs (Art. 34m lit. e VVRG)
Appeal Against Jointly Imposed Fine on Grounds of Individualized Sanction Principle
Cited in the reasoning (3) to justify the decision based on the file, due to the parties' waiver of a public hearing.
A3 24 1 · vs (art. 34m let. a et b LPJA)
Unauthorized Construction Material Depot Fine Upheld
Cited in the introduction as the basis for the cantonal judge's competence regarding the appeal.
A3 22 45 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG)
Transport on Forest Road Without Permit Upheld Despite Claim of Unwritten Practice
Cited in conjunction with procedural rules from the StPO when confirming the decision on appeal.
A3 23 6 · vs (Art. 34m let. a LPJA)
Administrative Penalty Upheld for Unauthorized Construction and Regulatory Violations
Cited in the reasoning section (consid. 1) as a ground establishing the admissibility of the appeal under this procedural framework.
A3 22 38 · vs (Art. 34m VVRG)
Appealability of Acquittal and Costs Reimbursement in Obstruction Case
This provision is cited in relation to the court's decision to proceed without an oral hearing (concluding point 1.4 and relating to costs in 3.2 and 3.3).
A3 22 38 · vs (Art. 34m lit. e VVRG)
Appealability of Acquittal and Costs Reimbursement in Obstruction Case
This procedural rule allowed the court to decide based on the file without an oral hearing, as the appellant implicitly consented.
A3 22 38 · vs (Art. 34m lit. f VVRG)
Appealability of Acquittal and Costs Reimbursement in Obstruction Case
This provision was cited in the reasoning section regarding the inadmissibility of a reformatio in peius, but it relates to the scope of the appeal procedure.
A3 22 32 · vs (art. 34m let. f LPJA)
Appeal Against Administrative Fine for Unauthorized Studio Conversion Due to Statute of Limitations
Cited as the procedural basis for annulling the decision on objection and the penalty order.
A3 22 36 · vs (art. 34m let. f LPJA)
Appeal Against Building Fine: Procedural Error and Fine Reduction
Cited as the legal basis for reforming the challenged decision regarding the administrative fine amount.