935.51 LVLJAR

CH-VD

Art. 2 LOI d'application de la loi fédérale du 29 septembre 2017 sur les jeux d'argent (LVLJAr) - Définitions

Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (29 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 2 LVLJAr · Définitions

1. Les termes spéciaux relatifs à la réglementation en matière de jeux d'argent sont définis dans la réglementation fédérale.

2. Au sens de la présente loi, on entend par

a. lotos : forme particulière de petites loteries organisées à l'occasion d'une réunion récréative, avec des lots en nature ou en espèces, dont les bénéfices nets sont affectés intégralement à l'utilité publique ou utilisés pour les propres besoins de l'exploitante ou de l'exploitant ;

b. tournoi occasionnel : tout tournoi de poker organisé par un exploitant gérant moins de 12 tournois par an et se tenant dans un lieu hébergeant moins de 12 tournois par an ;

c. tournoi régulier : tout tournoi de poker organisé par un exploitant gérant au moins 12 tournois par an ou se tenant dans un lieu hébergeant au moins 12 tournois par an.

← Art. 1 LVLJAr d'application de la loi fédérale du 29 septembre 2017 sur les jeux d'argent (LVLJAr) - But et objet Art. 3 LVLJAr →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (25)

VWBES.2024.226 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung (KBV, BGS 711.61))

Building Commission Objection Reversal and Remedial Period Requirement

This provision was cited in the reasoning (E. 1.1 and E. 3.2) to establish jurisdiction and address the issue of instancy loss, but it does not appear in the final dispositive orders (1. and 2.). Therefore, it must be excluded.

VWBES.2024.95 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 KBV, BGS 711.61)

Applicant v. Municipal Authority on Building Permits for Entryway, Balcony, and Privacy Screen

Cited as part of the procedural basis establishing the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

VWBES.2023.372 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung (KBV, BGS 711.61) i.V.m. § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz (GO, BGS 125.12))

Neighbor's Appeal Against Single-Family House Building Permit Dismissed on Merits and Procedure

These procedural provisions were cited as the basis for the Court's jurisdiction and admissibility finding in the reasoning, although the final orders only deal with costs and the dismissal of the appeal (Art. 1 LTF would be the likely main ground, but it is not cited in the dispositive).

VWBES.2023.374 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung (KBV, BGS 711.61) i.V.m. § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz (GO, BGS 125.12))

Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Agricultural Zone Construction and Terrain Modification

Cited to establish the admissibility of the appeal and the court's jurisdiction.

VWBES.2023.364 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 der Kantonalen Bauverordnung [KBV, BGS 711.61])

Embankment Removal Due to Encroachment and Lack of Consent

Cited in the reasoning confirming the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court.

VWBES.2023.269 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung, KBV, BGS 711.61)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Retroactive Permit Denial for Accessory Structures in Single-Family Zone

Cited in the reasoning to establish the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court to hear the appeal.

VWBES.2023.324 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung, KBV, BGS 711.61)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Unauthorized Access Road

Cited as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

VWBES.2021.2 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 der Kantonalen Bauverordnung (KBV, BGS 711.61))

Property Owners v. Zoning Authority (Building Permit Denial for Setback Violation)

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal as a second instance court.

OG O3V 20 10 · ar (Art. 2 der Verordnung über COVID-19-Massnahmen: Gerichte (bGS 113.2))

Appellant Fails to Prove Covered Accident or Causation for Insurance Benefits

Cited in the reasoning to justify the decision being made via circular procedure due to the COVID-19 situation.

VWBES.2020.412 · so (§ 2 der Verordnung über die Delegation der Unterschriftsberechtigung in den Departementen (BGS 122.218))

Appeal Regarding Procedural Defect in Cultural Heritage Building Permit Challenge

Cited in the reasoning to establish the requirement for administrative instruction orders to be signed by a lawyer.

VWBES.2019.239 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung, KBV, BGS 711.61)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Roof Addition Dismissed on Grounds of Valid Construction Right and Architectural Conformity

Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal.

OG O4V 19 11 · ar (Art. 2 des Gesetzes über die Gebühren in Verwaltungssachen, bGS 233.2)

Building Permit Denial Upheld for Landscape Protection Zone Windscreen

Not explicitly cited in the final orders.

VWBES.2019.65 · so (§ 2 der Kantonalen Bauverordnung, KBV, BGS 711.61)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hospice/Assisted Suicide Permit Condition

Cited in the reasoning as part of the legal basis for the admissibility of the appeal, although not strictly required by the rule, it is listed here as the relevant procedural ground that allowed the court to rule on the merits.

VWBES.2017.328 · so (§ 2 Abs. 4 KBV (Kantonale Bauverordnung, BGS 711.61))

Property Owner v. City: Appeal of Hotel Ventilation Permit Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung II.1.2) to establish the Administrative Court as the competent appellate authority.

VWBES.2018.282 · so (§ 2 Abs. 3 Kantonale Bauverordnung (KBV, BGS 711.61) i.V.m. § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz (GO, BGS 125.12))

Appellants v. Administrative Body Regarding Retroactive Building Permit for Wood-Fired Oven

These provisions established the court's competence and the admissibility of the appeal, leading to the decision to enter on the appeal.