935.51 LVLJAR

CH-VD

Art. 10 LOI d'application de la loi fédérale du 29 septembre 2017 sur les jeux d'argent (LVLJAr) - Requête

Chapitre IV

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (29 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 10 LVLJAr · Requête

1. Le Conseil d'Etat fixe la forme, le contenu et les délais de dépôt des requêtes d'autorisation en les harmonisant avec les autres cantons romands.

2. La documentation requise doit fournir les éléments suffisants pour déterminer si l'exploitant garantit une gestion et une exploitation des jeux transparentes et irréprochables, et si le jeu est conçu de manière à présenter un risque faible de jeu excessif.

← Art. 9 LVLJAr d'application de la loi fédérale du 29 septembre 2017 sur les jeux d'argent (LVLJAr) - But et objet Art. 11 LVLJAr →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (12)

VWBES.2024.388 · so (§ 10 Abs. 2 lit. c aGVG i.V.m. § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz, GO, BGS 125.12)

Property Owners v. Insurer (Water Damage Exclusion)

Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction and admissibility for the appeal, but not explicitly used in the final orders (except possibly implicitly by proceeding to the merits).

VWBES.2023.61 · so (§ 10 Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz (GVG, BGS 618.111))

Insurance Valuation Dispute and Cost-of-Living Adjustment Appeal

Cited as a procedural basis establishing the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal, although the dispositive only dismisses the appeal in part.

VWBES.2022.395 · so (§§ 10 Abs. 2 lit b und 41 Abs. 2 Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz [GVG, BGS 618.111] sowie § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz [GO, BGS 125.12])

Fire Damage Insurance Assessment Appeal

These provisions established the admissibility of the appeal and the court's jurisdiction to decide the matter.

VWBES.2022.214 · so (§ 10 Abs. 1 Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz, GVG, BGS 618.111)

Insurance Claim Rejection Upheld for Flooded Heat Pump

Cited as part of the legal basis confirming the jurisdiction and admissibility of the appeal (though the main ground for dismissal was lack of merit).

VWBES.2022.207 · so (§ 10 Abs. 1 und 2 lit. a i.V.m. § 29 Gebäudeversicherungsgesetz [GVG, BGS 618.111] i.V.m. § 49 Gerichtsorganisationsgesetz [GO, BGS 125.12])

Property Owners' Association Appeal of Property Valuation Dismissed

Cited to establish the court's jurisdiction and the admissibility of the appeal.

VWBES.2020.425 · so (Art. 10 Abs. 1 der kantonalen Verordnung über den Strassenverkehr (BGS 733.11))

Appeal Regarding Refusal to Reconsider 30 km/h Zones After Failed Referendum

Cited to establish that the Municipal Council (Gemeinderat) has the exclusive authority for traffic measures like the introduction of 30 km/h zones on municipal roads.

VWBES.2018.397 · so (§ 10 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 lit. c GVG (BGS 618.111))

Insurance Company Violated Fair Hearing in Damage Compensation Appeal

Cited as part of the provision establishing the court's jurisdiction to hear the appeal.

VWBES.2016.187 · so (§ 10 der Verordnung über den Strassenverkehr (BGS 733.11))

Municipality v. Department on 30 km/h Speed Limit Zone Implementation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the cantonal distribution of competence for traffic measures, showing the municipality's initial competence but its reliance on cantonal approval.

VWBES.2016.369 · so (§ 10 Abs. 2 der Verordnung über den Strassenverkehr (BGS 733.11))

Municipality v. Building and Justice Department: Traffic Sign Amendment for Bus Service

This provision was used to order the approval of the traffic measure (the additional sign) following the successful appeal.

FI.2006.0004 · vd (Art. 10 al. 1 LGD)

Property Owners Challenge Municipal Waste Collection Fee Structure

Although cited throughout the reasoning, it does not appear explicitly in the final orders (I to IV).

OG ARGVP 1999 2179 · ar (Art. 10 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit (VGerG, bGS 143.6))

Postal Box Holder Registered Letter Deemed Delivered Seven Days After Notice Despite Retention Order

This article establishes the 30-day deadline for filing appeals with the Administrative Court, which was central to determining the appeal was untimely.

FI.1995.0130 · vd (art. 10 LGD)

Property Owner Challenges Municipal Sewer and Waste Removal Taxes Based on Fire Insurance Value

The ruling relies on this article, which mandates that businesses handle transport costs for their solid waste (unless agreed otherwise), limiting the municipality's power to tax transport unilaterally.