935.31
LADB
CH-VD
Art. 60 LOI sur les auberges et les débits de boissons (LADB) - Fermeture temporaire ou définitive d'établissement [ 2 ]
Titre XI
Art. 60 LADB · Fermeture temporaire ou définitive d'établissement [ 2 ]
1. Le département retire la licence au sens de l'article 4 et peut ordonner la fermeture temporaire ou définitive d'un établissement lorsque
a. l'ordre public l'exige ;
b. les locaux, les installations ou les autres conditions d'exploitation ne répondent plus aux exigences imposées pour l'octroi de la licence ;
c. les émoluments cantonaux ou communaux liés à la licence ne sont pas acquittés dans le délai fixé par le règlement d'exécution [C] ;
d. les contributions aux assurances sociales que l'exploitant est également tenu de payer n'ont pas été acquittées dans un délai raisonnable.
2. …
3. …
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (45)
GE.2024.0350 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. d LADB)
Withdrawal of Hospitality License for Non-Payment of Social Security Contributions
This provision served as the legal basis for withdrawing the license due to non-payment of social security contributions, which was the core issue upheld by the court.
GE.2024.0008 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 LADB)
Tea Room Closure Order Upheld Due to Repeated Hygiene Violations
The court confirmed the decision which ordered temporary closure based on this article.
GE.2022.0169 · vd (Art. 60 al. 1 let. c LADB)
Business Entity v. Alcohol Licensing Authority (Partial License Withdrawal Sanction Appeal)
The failure to pay the first fee was legally based on this provision, leading to the potential withdrawal of the license.
GE.2018.0230 · vd (Art. 60 al. 1 let. b LADB)
Economic Promotion Service v. Restaurant License Suspension Appeal
Cited as the legal basis for imposing sanctions due to non-compliant operating conditions of the premises/facilities.
GE.2018.0138 · vd (Art. 60 LADB)
License Non-Renewal Upheld Due to Management and Documentation Failures
The court confirms the administrative decision to refuse the license prolongation and order the immediate closure, which relates to the grounds for withdrawal/closure in this article.
GE.2013.0115 · vd (Art. 60 LADB)
Appeal Regarding Discotheque Operating Conditions Rendered Moot by Change in Ownership
Cited in the background analysis (considered in the pilot ruling referenced in the reasoning) concerning the authority's power to order the closure of an establishment.
GE.2013.0157 · vd (art. 60 LADB)
Café Closure Upheld Due to Illegal Gambling and Safety Violations
The final decision confirms the administrative decision, which was based on this article regarding the withdrawal of the operating authorization and closure due to non-compliance.
GE.2013.0045 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. a LADB)
License Withdrawal for Drug Trafficking Premises Upheld
This article served as the substantive legal basis for confirming the initial decision to withdraw the license and order the establishment's closure.
GE.2013.0051 · vd (Art. 60 al. 2 let. a LADB)
Appeal Against Refusal of Operating Authorizations Due to Predecessor's Social Security Debts
The main ground for confirming the administrative decision was the serious and repeated violation of regulations related to the operation of the establishments concerning social security contributions.
GE.2012.0183 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. d LADB)
Withdrawal of Tea-Room License for Social Security Non-Payment
The court found that the ground for withdrawing the license was established because social insurance contributions were not paid within a reasonable time.
AC.2010.0278 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. a LADB)
Appeal Against Refusal of Special Authorization for Wellness Center
This provision was the substantive legal ground used by the administrative authority to refuse the initial authorization, which the court reviewed and found inapplicable.
GE.2010.0214 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. a LADB)
Discotheque License Conditions Appeal
Cited by the respondent authority as the basis for being able to order a closure, justifying the imposition of conditions instead, which the court implicitly accepted as part of the admissible restrictions.
GE.2010.0142 · vd (art. 60 al. 1 let. a et b LADB)
Nightclub Closure Upheld Due to Prostitution Use
These articles formed the basis for the annulment of the night-club license and the order for immediate closure due to the establishment being considered a prostitution salon.
GE.2010.0142 · vd (art. 60 al. 2 let. b LADB)
Nightclub Closure Upheld Due to Prostitution Use
This article was cited as an additional ground for closing the establishment due to repeated violations concerning the misuse of the operating authorization (Art. 34 LADB).
GE.2008.0244 · vd (art. 60 LADB)
Discotheque Operation Regulations Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to establish the authority's power to impose sanctions, including imposing specific requirements for continued operation, which justifies the conditional nature of the decision being reviewed.