935.31 LADB

CH-VD

Art. 35 LOI sur les auberges et les débits de boissons (LADB) - Autorisation d'exploiter [ 2 ]

Titre VII

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (87 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 35 LADB · Autorisation d'exploiter [ 2 ]

1. L'autorisation d'exploiter est délivrée par le département, cas échéant, après contrôle par les services compétents de la conformité des locaux.

2. Les personnes, physiques ou morales, condamnées pour des faits contraires à la probité ou à l'honneur peuvent se voir refuser une autorisation d'exploiter ou d'exercer, cela aussi longtemps que la condamnation n'est pas radiée du casier judiciaire.

← Art. 34 LADB sur les auberges et les débits de boissons (LADB) - But [ 2 ] Art. 36 LADB →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)

GE.2024.0196 · vd (art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Administrative Court Upholds Restaurant License Refusal Based on Criminal Record

The court applied this provision as the legal ground for upholding the refusal of the license based on the appellant's criminal record (facts contrary to probity or honor).

GE.2022.0159 · vd (art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Refusal to Renew Operating Authorization Due to Criminal Record

The court confirmed the decision based on the applicant having been convicted of acts contrary to probity or honor, as stipulated in this article.

GE.2021.0073 · vd (Art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Cantonal Police Denial of Alcohol License Based on Spousal Abuse Conviction Upheld

This provision was the substantive basis for the administrative decision being reviewed, concerning the refusal of the operating license due to previous convictions.

GE.2010.0214 · vd (art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Discotheque License Conditions Appeal

This provision was cited by the administrative authority as the basis for limiting the license duration, a point the court ultimately upheld (in the part where the appeal was rejected).

GE.2004.0108 · vd (art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Grocery Store Alcohol Permit Refusal Over Traffic Offenses Overturned

Cited in the reasoning, but the final order (II) implies that the conviction was not a valid ground for refusal under this provision by instructing the authority to disregard them.

GE.2000.0042 · vd (art. 35 al. 2 LADB)

Appeal Against Patent Revocation Based on Criminal Conviction and Closure Order

Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of refusing the authorization to operate under the new law during the re-evaluation phase.

RE.2001.0008 · vd (art. 35 LADB)

Operator Appeal Against Immediate Closure Order Based on Expired License

This article concerning patent applications and property owner authorization was mentioned in the reasoning when discussing the alleged grounds for the municipal interest in denying the suspensive effect.

GE.1999.0123 · vd (art. 35 LADB)

Café Closure Upheld Due to Lack of Valid Permit and Ineligible Substitute Operator

Cited as a requirement for the issuance of a patent, specifically the necessary agreement from the building owner.

GE.1994.0021 · vd (art. 35 LADB)

Administrative Appeal Against Café-Restaurant License Cancellation Due to Owner Absence and Invalid Reapplication

The lack of owner authorization required by this article justified the refusal to grant a new license and confirmed the closure order.