Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
913.11 LAF CH-VD

Art. 68 LOI sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - Principe

Titre IV, Chapitre II, Section IX
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 68 LAF · Principe

1. Le département [I] arrête, d'office ou sur demande de la direction du syndicat, la date à laquelle la propriété des immeubles et les autres droits sont transférés des anciens sur les nouveaux biens-fonds. La direction du syndicat notifie cette date aux intéressés.

← Art. 67 LAF sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - But [ 12, 14, 20 ] Art. 69 LAF →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (13)

AC.2014.0426 · vd (Art. 68 de la loi sur les améliorations foncières (LAF; RSV 913.11))
Property Owner v. Neighborhood Plan Approval and Land Consolidation Scheme Validity
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the departmental competence to fix the date of transfer of rights, relevant to the overall land consolidation context.
AC.2015.0006 · vd (Art. 68 de la loi sur les améliorations foncières (LAF; RSV 913.11))
Property Owners v. Neighborhood Development Plan Adoption
Cited in the reasoning to explain the cantonal department's competence regarding the transfer of property rights following the readjustment.
AF.2014.0001 · vd (Art. 68 de la loi sur les améliorations foncières (LAF; RSV 913.11))
Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Consolidation Valuation)
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for setting the date of transfer of property rights, although the primary ground for rejection is not explicitly linked to this article in the dispositive.
AF.2014.0001 · vd (art. 68 LAF)
Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Consolidation Valuation)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cantonal department's competence to set the date for the transfer of property rights.
AF.2015.0001 · vd (art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Land Readjustment Classification Decision Upheld Despite Equalization Claims
The court cited these articles regarding the registration of new parcels in the land register, which determines the final state of property.
AF.2015.0002 · vd (Art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Land Equalization Dispute Involving Property Exchange and Taxation
Cited in the reasoning section (3) regarding the elements to be registered in the land register.
AF.2015.0002 · vd (art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Land Equalization Dispute Involving Property Exchange and Taxation
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the registration of new parcels in the land register following the land readjustment.
AF.2001.0005 · vd (art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Exchange Valuation)
These articles regarding real equalization were cited in the background reasoning leading to the prior decision that was overturned.
AF.2001.0008 · vd (art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Appeal Against Land Readjustment and Easement Allocation Decision
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the previous decision, it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (I-IV).
AF.1999.0023 · vd (art. 68 à 70 et art 93 LAF)
State Appeal on Land Valuation Under Cantonal Development Plan
Cited in the reasoning concerning the principle that the entry into force of new building regulations must be deferred until property transfer, justifying the double estimation.
AF.1999.0005 · vd (Art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Appeal Against Property Value Determination in Land Consolidation Scheme
Cited in the reasoning (Considering 1.h) to support the requirement that the legal status of land must not be fixed (i.e., double estimation requires postponement of plan entry into force).
AF.1999.0010 · vd (art. 68 à 70 LAF)
Land Consolidation Appeal Rejection: Real Equalization and Pedestrian Servitude Upheld
Cited as provisions allowing the deferral of the entry into force of construction regulations until the transfer of property, which supports the principle of real equalization.
AF.1998.0008 · vd (Art. 68 LAF)
Appeal Against Right-of-Way Servitude and Municipal Authorization Annulled Due to Flawed Process and Unspecified Redevelopment Plans
Mentioned in reasoning in relation to property transfer, which is part of the context leading to the final referral order (Order IV).