913.11 LAF

CH-VD

Art. 44 LOI sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - Travaux d'exécution [ 6, 12 ]

Titre III, Chapitre X

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 44 LAF · Travaux d'exécution [ 6, 12 ]

1. Les propriétaires participent aux frais, déduction faite des subventions, proportionnellement aux avantages procurés à leurs fonds par les travaux collectifs et géométriques, suivant le tableau dressé par la commission de classification. La commission de classification peut répartir d'une manière distincte les frais provoqués par des travaux réalisés sans subvention ou intéressant des parcelles ne donnant pas droit aux subventions.

2. Pour les travaux privés, les frais sont supportés en principe par les intéressés, déduction faite des subventions éventuelles.

3. Les frais d'exécution sont exigibles dès que la répartition des frais est définitive.

4. Il appartient à l'assemblée générale de fixer les modalités de paiement, soit le délai de paiement, qui ne peut être supérieur à cinq ans, et le taux d'intérêt dû dès l'exigibilité.

← Art. 43 LAF sur les améliorations foncières (LAF) - But [ 12, 14, 20 ] Art. 45 LAF →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (29)

AF.2012.0004 · vd (art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Property Owners v. Classification Commission on Land Consolidation Cost Allocation

Substantive basis for the cost sharing that the court ordered the authority to recalculate in a new decision.

AF.2011.0005 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Property Owners' Appeal of Land Readjustment Valuation and Cost Allocation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of cost allocation, although the specific application in the dispositive is procedural regarding the non-opponability of the initial cost key.

AF.2011.0006 · vd (Art. 44 de la loi sur les améliorations foncières (LAF))

Syndicate Valuation Challenge Affirmed

Cited as defining the principles for the apportionment of costs (key of distribution of expenses).

AF.2009.0003 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Property Owner Appeal on Land Improvement Cost-Sharing Key

Cited in the reasoning regarding the principle of owner participation in execution costs proportionate to the benefits derived from collective works.

AF.2009.0006 · vd (art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Property Owner v. Management Committee Regarding Anticipatory Land Improvement Payments

Cited in the reasoning as the general principle for allocating costs proportionally to the advantages derived from collective works.

AF.2009.0007 · vd (Art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Property Owner v. Land Improvement Syndicate: Advance Payment Dispute

Cited by the court to justify the principle that owners must contribute to costs proportionally to the benefits received by their property, supporting the decision on advance payments.

AF.2006.0001 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Syndicate Land Improvement Classification Appeal on Real Compensation and Equipment Obligations

Mentioned in the body of the decision as the basis for cost allocation according to the advantages conferred on the property.

AF.2001.0010 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Property Owner v. Land Improvement Association: Cost Apportionment and Subsidy Restitution in Land Development and Quarry Extraction

Although cited in the reasoning regarding the assessment of costs, this article was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders which only ordered the annulment of the decisions.

AF.2004.0001 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Equestrian Facility Subsidy Restitution Dispute

The provision was discussed regarding the distinct apportionment of costs for plots not eligible for subsidies, but ultimately the main grounds for appeal were found elsewhere.

AF.2004.0001 · vd (Art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Equestrian Facility Subsidy Restitution Dispute

The provision on distinct apportionment of costs was discussed in relation to the good faith principle but was not the primary basis for the final order.

AF.2000.0007 · vd (art. 44 al. 2 LAF)

Property Owner v. Classification Commission Regarding Drainage Work

This provision regarding the allocation of costs for drainage works was referenced in the reasoning when explaining the existing legal framework for such costs.

AF.2000.0014 · vd (Art. 44 LAF)

Property Owner v. Land Improvement Syndicate Regarding Road Construction Cost Allocation

The court confirmed the decision regarding cost allocation based on the principle stated in this article regarding proportional participation in costs based on benefits.

AF.1999.0012 · vd (art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Vineyard Owner v. Classification Commission (Green Value Tax Recalculation)

Mentioned in the reasoning section regarding the allocation of costs based on advantages from the land consolidation, which is relevant to the overall context but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders for the final ruling on the merits or costs.

AF.1998.0008 · vd (Art. 44 al. 1 LAF)

Appeal Against Right-of-Way Servitude and Municipal Authorization Annulled Due to Flawed Process and Unspecified Redevelopment Plans

Cited in the reasoning regarding the allocation of costs, relevant to the context of the decision to annul and refer back (Order IV).

AF.1996.0026 · vd (art. 44 LAF)

Land Improvement Syndicate Advance Payment Obligation Post-Insolvency

Cited in the reasoning to define the owners' participation in the costs of collective works (contribution de plus-value).