832.01 LVLAMAL

CH-VD

Art. 9 LOI d'application vaudoise de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LVLAMal) - Bénéficiaires [ 10, 11 ]

Titre II, Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (48 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 9 LVLAMal · Bénéficiaires [ 10, 11 ]

1. Les assurés de condition économique modeste assujettis à la présente loi au sens de l'article 2 peuvent bénéficier d'un subside pour le paiement de tout ou partie de leurs primes de l'assurance obligatoire des soins.

2. Sont considérées comme étant de condition économique modeste les personnes dont le revenu calculé conformément aux articles 11 et 12 est égal ou inférieur aux limites fixées par le Conseil d'Etat ou qui remplissent les conditions d'octroi d'un subside spécifique au sens de l‘article 17a.

3. N'est notamment pas considérée comme étant de condition économique modeste, toute personne disposant de ressources financières insuffisantes en raison d'un choix délibéré de sa part.

4. Le règlement [E] précise les cas dans lesquels les assurés ne peuvent manifestement pas être considérés comme étant de condition économique modeste.

← Art. 8 LVLAMal d'application vaudoise de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LVLAMal) - But Art. 10 LVLAMal →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (29)

LAVAM.6.22.3.2023 · vd (art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Insured v. Subsidy Authority (Medical Limitation on Earning Capacity)

This provision, concerning the definition of modest economic condition, was used in the reasoning to determine that an insured person deliberately maintaining insufficient resources is excluded, although the final order admitted the appeal based on the grounds that the taxpayer's reduced capacity was medically justified (thus overcoming the presumption of deliberate choice implied by this article).

LAVAM.2.22.2.2023 · vd (art. 9 al. 1 LVLAMal)

Insured's Appeal Against Restitution of Health Insurance Subsidies Following Inheritance

Cited in the context of the initial condition for receiving subsidies, which was relevant to the initial decision challenged.

LAVAM.4.22.9.2022 · vd (Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Claimant v. State Insurance Fund (Health Insurance Subsidies)

Cited as a key provision defining who is not considered to be of modest economic standing, particularly concerning deliberate renunciation of earning capacity, which was central to denying the subsidy for certain periods.

Arr.t.2022.283 · vd (art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Appeal Dismissed: Voluntary Renunciation of Employment Precludes Health Insurance Subsidy Eligibility

This provision was cited in the final order (III) as it establishes the condition for denying the subsidy based on a deliberate choice leading to insufficient financial resources.

HC.2021.168 · vd (Art. 9 LVLAMal)

Cantonal Liability for Official's Negligence in Disability Claim Appeal

Cited in the reasoning section regarding subsides for insured persons of modest economic condition in Vaud.

Arr.t.2021.16 · vd (art. 9 LVLAMal)

Appeal Regarding 2017 Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Based on Annualized Unemployment Income

Cited as the cantonal implementation determining that modestly situated insured persons can benefit from a subsidy based on income calculated according to Articles 11 and 12 LVLAMal.

Arr.t.2019.522 · vd (art. 9 al. 2 LVLAMal)

Appeal on Health Insurance Subsidy Reduction Based on Untimely Opposition and Income Calculation

Defines low-income insured persons whose income is equal to or less than the reference income calculated according to Articles 11 and 12 LVLAMal, relevant for the subsidy entitlement.

Arr.t.2017.789 · vd (Art. 9 LVLAMal)

Insured Denied Premium Subsidies Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts

This provision defines who is considered an insured person of modest economic condition for the purpose of subsidies.

Arr.t.2017.137 · vd (Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Insured Person's Deliberate Part-Time Employment Bars Health Insurance Subsidy Eligibility

This provision defines a person not considered of modest economic status, which was the basis for rejecting the appeal in the final order.

Arr.t.2016.81 · vd (Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Provisional Resident Denied Health Subsidies Due to Public Assistance and Employment Status

Cited as part of the legal basis for denying the right to subsidies because the appellant chose not to use their earning capacity.

Arr.t.2015.1058 · vd (Art. 9 al. 1 LVLAMal)

Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Upheld for Voluntary Underemployment

This provision, cited in the reasoning before the final orders, defines the general right to a premium reduction for insured persons of modest economic standing, justifying the overall framework for the decision.

Arr.t.2015.1058 · vd (Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Upheld for Voluntary Underemployment

This provision defines who is not considered to be of modest economic standing, specifically excluding those who deliberately forgo their full earning capacity, which was the basis for rejecting the appeal.

Arr.t.2015.617 · vd (Art. 9 LVLAMal)

Insured Person v. Insurance Office Regarding Sickness Benefit Subsidy Recalculation

Cited in the introductory list of applicable provisions and relates to the definition of insured persons eligible for subsidies.

Arr.t.2014.317 · vd (Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal)

Insurance Subsidy Eligibility Based on Intentional Unemployment

This provision excludes persons with insufficient financial resources due to deliberate choice from being considered of modest economic status, justifying the rejection of the subsidy.

Arr.t.2014.117 · vd (Art. 9 LVLAMal)

Appeal Dismissed: Denial of 2013 Health Insurance Subsidies Upheld Due to Voluntary Income Limitation

The rejection of the appeal confirms the denial of the subsidy based on the criteria established in this article.