832.01
LVLAMAL
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 28 LOI d'application vaudoise de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LVLAMal) - Recours [ 1, 6, 10, 11 ]
Titre IV
Art. 28 LVLAMal · Recours [ 1, 6, 10, 11 ]
1. Les décisions de l'OVAM rendues en vertu de la présente loi peuvent faire l'objet d'une réclamation.
1bis. Les décisions sur réclamation de l'OVAM peuvent faire l'objet d'un recours au Tribunal cantonal.
2. Les réclamations et les recours n'ont pas d'effet suspensif.
3. La loi du 28 octobre 2008 sur la procédure administrative est applicable.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (18)
LAVAM.2.22.2.2023 · vd (art. 28 LVLAMal)
Insured's Appeal Against Restitution of Health Insurance Subsidies Following Inheritance
Used to establish the jurisdiction and procedure for appealing the administrative decision to the Social Insurance Court.
Arr.t.2019.522 · vd (art. 28 LVLAMal)
Appeal on Health Insurance Subsidy Reduction Based on Untimely Opposition and Income Calculation
The ruling is subject to the rules of administrative appeal procedure under this provision, which governed the context of the appeal.
Arr.t.2017.946 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Insured Persons v. Health Insurance Premium Subsidy Calculation
This article is cited in relation to the cantonal procedural law (LPA-VD) governing the administrative appeal procedure applicable in this case.
Arr.t.2017.631 · vd (art. 28 al. 2 LVLAMal)
Insured v. State Social Insurance Office (Subsidy Calculation Basis)
Cited regarding the immediate entry into force of the decision rejecting the appeal, as there was no suspensive effect.
Arr.t.2017.32 · vd (art. 28 al. 2 LVLAMal)
Insurance Premium Subsidy Based on Prior Tax Assessment Upheld
This provision addresses the immediate entry into force of the decision (no suspensive effect on the appeal), relevant to the enforcement of the order.
Arr.t.2015.727 · vd (Art. 28 LVLAMal)
Insured v. Health Insurance Authority (Premature Appeal)
Cited in the reasoning to establish that only decisions rendered on opposition by the OVAM are subject to appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal, which justifies declaring the appeal premature.
Arr.t.2014.694 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Appeal Regarding Health Insurance Premium Subsidies Based on Change in Income Circumstances and Deductible Expenses
This provision was cited in conjunction with the administrative appeal procedure rules (LPA-VD).
Arr.t.2014.672 · vd (Art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Over RDU Calculation Method
Indicates that the cantonal administrative procedure rules apply to the appeal.
Arr.t.2014.653 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Insured Person v. Cantonal Health Insurance Office (2014 Subsidy Calculation)
Cited as part of the applicable administrative procedure rules governing the appeal.
Arr.t.2012.274 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Based on Insufficient Income Recalculation Threshold
This provision relates the procedure under LPA-VD to the specific area of application of the LVLAMal in this case.
Arr.t.2010.1695 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Health Insurance Subsidy Termination Upheld Based on Domestic Community Finding
This provision was cited in connection with the LPA-VD to establish the applicable administrative appeal procedure.
Arr.t.2010.1305 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Supplementary Benefit Reduction Upheld Despite Appeal on Actual Financial Need
Cited in conjunction with the LPA-VD as establishing the applicability of administrative appeal rules.
Arr.t.2010.1323 · vd (art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Ministers' Health Insurance Subsidy Appeal over Voluntary Income Forfeiture
Cited as the procedural rule governing the administrative appeal process applicable to this case.
Arr.t.2010.358 · vd (Art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Cantonal Health Insurance Premium Subsidy Appeal Regarding Actual Financial Situation Assessment
Cited to establish the Cantonal Tribunal's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal.
Arr.t.2009.761 · vd (Art. 28 al. 1 LVLAMal)
Taxpayer Challenge to Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Based on Determinant Income Calculation
Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Tribunal's competence to rule on the appeal.