832.01.1 RLVLAMAL

CH-VD

Art. 17 RÈGLEMENT concernant la loi du 25 juin 1996 d'application vaudoise de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (RLVLAMal) - Restriction à la condition économique modeste (art. 9 loi) [ 6 ]

Titre II, Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (43 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 17 RLVLAMal · Restriction à la condition économique modeste (art. 9 loi) [ 6 ]

1. Au sens de l'article 9, alinéa 3, de la loi, n'est notamment pas considérée comme étant de condition économique modeste la personne qui, par choix personnel

a. a contracté des dettes en vue d'investissement, a utilisé une partie de son patrimoine pour se constituer une rente viagère ou s'est dessaisie de tout ou partie de ses biens sans contrepartie équitable ;

b. est au bénéfice de prestations d'entretien accordées par une communauté religieuse ou apparentée ;

c. a intentionnellement et librement renoncé à mettre toute sa capacité de gain à contribution ;

d. renonce sciemment à des prestations auxquelles elle pourrait avoir droit en vertu d'une autre assurance sociale.

← Art. 16a RLVLAMal RÈGLEMENT concernant la loi du 25 juin 1996 d'application vaudoise de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (RLVLAMal) - [ 6 ] Art. 18 RLVLAMal →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (12)

LAVAM.6.22.3.2023 · vd (art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)

Insured v. Subsidy Authority (Medical Limitation on Earning Capacity)

This cantonal regulation provision defines when a person is not considered to be of modest economic condition due to a deliberate choice not to use their full earning capacity, which was central to the initial denial of subsidies.

LAVAM.4.22.9.2022 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Claimant v. State Insurance Fund (Health Insurance Subsidies)

Cited as the detailed criteria (specifically art. 17 let. c) used to deny the subsidy for periods where the appellant deliberately limited her earning capacity.

Arr.t.2022.283 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMAL)

Appeal Dismissed: Voluntary Renunciation of Employment Precludes Health Insurance Subsidy Eligibility

This provision was cited in the final order (III) as it further specified the scenario where the applicant intentionally and freely renounced putting their earning capacity to use.

Arr.t.2018.634 · vd (art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)

Revocation of Subsidy Upheld Due to Lack of Job Search Documentation

This provision was cited as the basis for confirming the appellant is not considered an insured person of modest economic condition due to intentionally waiving their earning capacity.

Arr.t.2017.789 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Insured Denied Premium Subsidies Due to Insufficient Job Search Efforts

The court found that the appellant's situation met the criteria of the 3rd hypothesis of this article (intentionally renouncing the utilization of earning capacity), leading to the confirmation of the decision to deny subsidies.

Arr.t.2016.81 · vd (Art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)

Provisional Resident Denied Health Subsidies Due to Public Assistance and Employment Status

Cited as part of the legal basis for denying the right to subsidies because the appellant chose not to use their earning capacity.

Arr.t.2015.1058 · vd (Art. 17 let. c RLVLAMal)

Health Insurance Subsidy Denial Upheld for Voluntary Underemployment

This provision specifies the cantonal interpretation of Art. 9 al. 3 LVLAMal regarding the voluntary renunciation of full earning capacity, forming the direct legal basis for confirming the refusal of the subsidy.

Arr.t.2014.317 · vd (Art. 17 al. 1 let. a à c RLVLAMal)

Insurance Subsidy Eligibility Based on Intentional Unemployment

This article specifies the conditions under which a person is not considered to be of modest economic status due to deliberate choice, aligning with the grounds for rejecting the subsidy.

Arr.t.2014.117 · vd (Art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Appeal Dismissed: Denial of 2013 Health Insurance Subsidies Upheld Due to Voluntary Income Limitation

The court confirmed the decision because the appellant's situation met the criteria defined in this article (specifically the 3rd hypothesis, concerning voluntarily foregoing earning capacity).

Arr.t.2013.312 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Insured Pastor Denied Health Insurance Subsidies Due to Maintenance Benefits and Partial Employment

The court confirmed that the appellant's situation met the third hypothesis of Art. 17 RLVLAMal, leading to the rejection of the subsidy claim.

Arr.t.2011.370 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Insured Person v. Controlling Body (Health Insurance Subsidy Termination)

Used to establish that the appellant is not considered to be of modest economic condition because he intentionally renounced using his full earning capacity.

Arr.t.2010.1323 · vd (art. 17 RLVLAMal)

Ministers' Health Insurance Subsidy Appeal over Voluntary Income Forfeiture

Cited as the cantonal regulation detailing specific situations where a person is not considered of modest economic standing.