822.11 LEMP

CH-VD

Art. 36 LOI sur l'emploi (LEmp) - Suppression et restitution [ 9 ]

Titre II, Chapitre III, Section III

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (101 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 36 LEmp · Suppression et restitution [ 9 ]

1. La violation des obligations liées à l'octroi des mesures cantonales d'insertion professionnelle mentionnées à l'article 26, alinéa 1, lettres a et b, peut donner lieu à leur suppression et à la restitution des sommes perçues indûment, avec intérêt et frais. L'article 41de la LASV [R] demeure réservé.

2. L'autorité compétente réclame, par voie de décision, au bénéficiaire ou à sa succession, le remboursement de toutes prestations perçues indûment.

3. La décision entrée en force est assimilée à un jugement exécutoire au sens de l'article 80 de la loi fédérale sur la poursuite pour dettes et la faillite (LP) [Y] .

← Art. 34 LEmp sur l'emploi (LEmp) - But [ 6, 9 ] Art. 37 LEmp →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (14)

PS.2020.0006 · vd (art. 36 al. 1 LEmp)

Employer Repayment Obligation for Canceled Job Initiation Allowance Following Termination for Economic Reasons

The court confirmed the decision to suppress the ACIT based on the violation of obligations related to professional integration measures.

PS.2017.0071 · vd (art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Reimbursement Obligation for Premature Termination of Subsidized Employment

Cited in the reasoning regarding the consequences of violating obligations related to professional integration measures (suppression and restitution).

PS.2017.0071 · vd (art. 36 de la loi du 5 juillet 2005 sur l’emploi (LEmp; RSV 822.11))

Employer Reimbursement Obligation for Premature Termination of Subsidized Employment

Cited in the reasoning regarding the employer's standing to appeal concerning the obligation to reimburse benefits.

PS.2017.0053 · vd (Art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Must Repay Work Initiation Allowances After Ordinary Termination.

Basis for the suppression of professional insertion measures and the restitution of unduly received sums in case of violation of obligations.

PS.2016.0015 · vd (art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Appeal Against Revocation of Work Initiation Allowances Following Employee Dismissal

The court confirmed the decision based on the violation of obligations related to the granting of cantonal professional integration measures (ACIT).

PS.2016.0063 · vd (art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Termination Breach and Allowance Revocation Limitation

This provision was cited in the reasoning to establish the legal basis for the recovery of improperly paid allowances, which is the core issue addressed by the judgment's outcome.

PS.2012.0025 · vd (Art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Liability for Repayment of Work Initiation Allowances Following Premature Termination

This provision concerning the violation of obligations related to professional integration measures and the restitution of unduly received sums was cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal and the basis for reimbursement.

PS.2011.0036 · vd (art. 36 LEmp)

Company Appeal of ACIT Denial Based on Prior Terminations

Cited to explain the legal consequences (suppression and restitution) of violating ACIT obligations.

PS.2011.0008 · vd (Art. 36 LEmp)

Employer Appeal Against Revocation of Work Initiation Allowance Following Termination

Cited in the initial consideration to establish the immediate financial impact of the contested decision on the appellant, confirming admissibility.

PS.2011.0028 · vd (Art. 36 de la loi du 5 juillet 2005 sur l'emploi (LEmp; RSV 822.11))

Employer Reimbursement Obligation for Subsidized Training Upon Premature Termination Modified by Employee Incapacity

Cited as the basis for the potential restitution of the initiation allowances, which is the subject of the administrative decision being reviewed.

PS.2009.0089 · vd (art. 36 al. 1 LEmp)

Employer Challenge to Restitution of Work Initiation Allowances Due to Unproven Salary Payments

This provision was cited as the justification for requiring the restitution of benefits due to violation of the conditions for granting work initiation allowances.

PS.2008.0072 · vd (Art. 36 Lemp)

Employer's Appeal Against Revocation of Work Initiation Allowances Due to Unjustified Termination

Cited in the final ruling (Point 5) as the basis for confirming the revocation of the ACIT grant due to unjustified termination of the contract.

PS.2009.0015 · vd (art. 36 al. 1 LEmp)

Fitness for Placement Denial Due to Unmet Childcare Requirements

Cited as the provision that the ORP must consider when making a potential decision regarding the restitution of benefits due to the appellant starting new employment.

PS.2007.0013 · vd (art. 36 al. 1 LEmp)

Employer Repayment of Work Initiation Allowances After Ordinary Termination During Trial Period

The basis for the employer being required to reimburse the allowances was cited when establishing the legal foundation for the reimbursement decision.