822.11
LEMP
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 3 LOI sur l'emploi (LEmp) - Champ d'application personnel
Titre I, Chapitre I
Art. 3 LEmp · Champ d'application personnel
1. La présente loi s'applique
a. aux demandeurs d'emploi et aux chômeurs qui résident dans le canton, ainsi qu'aux travailleurs exerçant une activité, régulière ou temporaire, dans le canton;
b. aux entreprises ou aux employeurs
- exerçant une activité régulière ou temporaire dans le canton et/ou
- ayant leur domicile, leur siège, une succursale ou un établissement dans le canton.
2. Les lois spéciales sont réservées.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (24)
AN230056 · zh (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
IT Manager Overtime Compensation and Executive Status Determination
This provision determined the applicability of the Labour Act, which was the core issue for granting the overtime claim.
810.2023.288 · bl (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Sunday Work Ban Near Public Transport Stop Quashed Due to Lack of Passenger Volume Assessment
Cited as an exemption from the Sunday work prohibition for higher management personnel.
CPR 2022 111 · ju (Art. 3 let. e LTr et 12 OLT 1)
Labor Act Applies to Substitute Watchman at Public Service Association
Used to discuss the inapplicability of the law to social workers, educators, and supervisors, with exceptions.
C/24438/2017 · ge (art. 3 let. d LTr)
Wrongful Termination, Overtime Compensation, and Appeal Decision
Cited in the reasoning concerning the definition of a high managerial function that would exclude overtime pay entitlement under LTr.
C/6596/2017 · ge (art. 3 let. d LTr)
Employee Termination for Cause and Unpaid Wages Dispute
Cited to exclude the application of the LTr, which the court ultimately rejected in the reasoning, but the provision itself is part of the discussion determining the right to overtime pay supplements.
AH170024 · zh (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Overtime Pay Awarded to Former Employee After Executive Status Rejected
This provision was used to determine whether the plaintiff qualified as a 'higher-ranking employee' and was therefore excluded from the scope of the ArG, impacting his ability to claim overtime pay.
VB.2018.00109 · zh (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Physician's Overtime Compensation Claim Rejected
Mentioned in the context of excluding the application of the Labour Act, although the court ultimately found no compensation owed based on Art. 13 ArG.
BE.2016.32 · sg (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Employee Status in Cooperative Restaurant Subject to Collective Bargaining Agreement
The court confirmed that the employee did not hold a position qualifying as higher management activity under this article, which would exclude him from the scope of the L-GAV.
BE.2016.32 · sg (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Employee Membership Status Versus Collective Bargaining Agreement Coverage
The court determined that the employee did not exercise a higher managerial activity as defined in this article, which would exclude him from the scope of the L-GAV.
AbR.2012.13.Nr.6 · ow (Art. 3 ArG)
Employer Cannot Deduct Minus Hours or Withhold Bonus Without Proof
Defines categories of employees excluded from the scope of the Labour Act, specifically those in higher management positions.
CC 2014 58 · ju (art. 3 let. d LTr)
Non-Compete Invalidated, Bonus Partially Upheld, Overtime Denied
Defines which workers are not subject to the Working Time Act (LTr), specifically those exercising a high managerial function.
LA130004 · zh (Art. 3 Abs. 1 lit. d ArG)
Employee v. Former Employer: Wrongful Termination, Bonuses, and Overtime Appeal
This article defining higher-level employees exempt from maximum working time rules was discussed regarding the claim for overtime compensation.
A/2349/2011 · ge (art. 3 let. d LTr)
Store Managers' Executive Function Status Upheld; Sunday Closing Law Applies
The court confirmed the decision that the managers did not hold an executive function exempting them from the scope of the Federal Act on Work in Industry and Commerce (LTr).
RBOG.2009.Nr.21 · tg (Art. 3 lit. d ArG)
Employee Executive Exemption Overtime Compensation Appeal
The court concluded that the employee did not perform a higher management activity as defined by this article, making the provisions of the ArG applicable.
C/5740/2004 · ge (art. 3 lit. d LTr)
Employee Overtime Claim After Dismissal
Used to exclude the application of the LTr to high-level management personnel, which the court found the appellant was not.