741.11
LTVB
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 3 LOI sur la taxe des véhicules automobiles et des bateaux (LTVB) - Encaissement et frais
Chapitre I
Art. 3 LTVB · Encaissement et frais
1. La taxe est payée en général sur facture. Elle peut être réclamée au comptant, au moment de la prestation, dans les cas suivants
a. Pour les plaques à court terme, les plaques provisoires et d'exportation ;
b. Lorsque le compte de la détentrice ou du détenteur présente des arriérés.
2. Elle est payable en une seule fois.
3. Des frais sont prélevés pour les rappels. Leur montant est fixé par le Conseil d'Etat.
4. Les frais inhérents au remboursement de la taxe sont facturés à l'administré.
5. Le service en charge des automobiles et des bateaux [C] (ci-après : le Service) perçoit la taxe.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (64)
Jug.2022.410 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Appeal: Phone Use Acquittal, Parking and License Plate Upheld
The acquittal on the charge of simple violation of traffic rules is based on the court finding that the constituent elements of this offense were not met.
Jug.2022.168 · vd (art. 3 al. 1, 6 al. 1 OCR)
Public Prosecutor v. Defendant (Traffic Violation Sentence Appeal)
These articles relate to the substantive offense (violation grave des règles de la circulation routière) which the final order confirms the conviction for.
Jug.2021.429 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
State v. Defendant (Traffic Violations and Hit-and-Run)
This provision establishes the duty of attention required of drivers, used in conjunction with Art. 90 al. 1 LCR regarding the traffic violation conviction.
Jug.2021.354 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Negligent Homicide Appeal Affirmed with Increased Penalties and Damages
Cited in the reasoning regarding driver's attention, but not in the final dispositive orders.
Jug.2021.265 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Violation of Traffic Rules Due to Minor Inattention in Parking Lot
The violation of this provision (failure to devote attention to the road) established the guilt of the appellant.
Jug.2021.108 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Exclusion of Video Evidence
Cited in the application section (dispositive) as a provision violated, leading to the confirmation of the conviction for gross violation of traffic rules.
Jug.2020.420 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
State v. Appellant (Traffic Violation Reversal)
The appeal was admitted because the contravention under this article was found not to be realized, leading to the acquittal of the defendant.
D.cision.2020.10 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Public Prosecutor v. Acquittal for Mobile Phone Use While Driving
Cited in the reasoning concerning the standard of driver attention allegedly breached.
Jug.2020.271 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Pedestrian Collision
The lower court's finding that the appellant violated this provision, which was confirmed by the appeal court, remains the substantive basis of the conviction in the final orders.
Jug.2019.467 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm Conviction Upheld Despite Visibility Defense
Cited in the final pronouncements as a basis for confirming the driver's duty to pay attention to traffic.
Jug.2019.330 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Appeal Affirming Conviction for Dangerous Overtaking
This provision was used to confirm the conviction for serious violation of traffic rules (driver's attention to the road).
Jug.2019.277 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 et 96 OCR)
Accident and Fleeing Scene Conviction Upheld on Factual Review
These articles from the Ordinance on Road Traffic Regulations (OCR) are cited as the basis for the conviction confirmed by the appeal court.
Jug.2018.397 · vd (art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Negligent Bodily Harm Appeal Regarding Roundabout Collision
Cited in the preamble to the orders, relating to the duty of attention for road users.
Jug.2018.252 · vd (Art. 3 al. 1 OCR)
Traffic Violation Severity Appeal
Cited in the operative part, this likely relates to the application of the ordinance on traffic rules regarding the infraction.
Jug.2018.194 · vd (art. 3 et 4 al. 1, 4a al. 1 let. b et al. 5 OCR)
State v. Appellant (Traffic Violations and Reckless Overtaking)
Traffic ordinance rules whose violation was confirmed as part of the aggravated offense under Art. 90 al. 3 LCR.