Art. 12 LOI sur la taxe des véhicules automobiles et des bateaux (LTVB) - Abrogation

Jug.2021.76 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Credibility of Testimony

Cited in the final orders as a provision establishing the underlying offense for which the appeal was rejected.

D.cision.2019.72 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 et 2 OCR)

Motorcyclist v. Prosecutor (Improper Dismissal of Criminal Complaint)

Cited in the preamble, relevant to sudden braking/stopping.

Jug.2016.465 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Traffic Violation Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Distance and Failure to Signal

Cited in the final determination that the appellant was guilty of violating traffic rules by not observing a sufficient distance.

Jug.2016.135 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Traffic Violation Appeal Regarding Coerced Statement

This article, which concretizes the requirement for maintaining sufficient distance, is cited in the list of applied provisions relevant to the conviction.

Jug.2014.231 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 et 29 al. 1 OCR)

Appellant v. Police Court on Traffic Violation Findings

These articles define the specific rules of traffic (OCR) whose violation was maintained against the appellant.

Jug.2013.201 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Traffic Violation Appeal Rejection: Dangerous Overtaking and Insufficient Following Distance

This provision specifies the required safe following distance, which was a basis for upholding the conviction.

CR.2010.0001 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 de l’ordonnance fédérale du 13 novembre 1962 sur les règles de la circulation routière (OCR; RS 741.11))

License Withdrawal Upheld for Tailgating and Improper Lane Change

Cited in the reasoning regarding the specific rule on maintaining a sufficient distance when following another vehicle.

CR.2008.0221 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 de l’ordonnance du 13 novembre 1962 sur les règles de la circulation routière (OCR ; RS 741.11))

License Revocation Upheld Based on Prior Criminal Traffic Conviction

Cited as the provision violated by the appellant's failure to maintain a sufficient distance when following another vehicle.

CR.2008.0123 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Appeal Against Three-Month License Withdrawal for Tailgating

This provision specifies the requirement to keep a sufficient distance when vehicles follow each other, confirming the basis of the violation.

CR.2008.0173 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Motorist Appeal of License Suspension for Highway Accident

Cited in the legal considerations to complete the rule on maintaining a sufficient distance when vehicles follow each other, forming the background for the underlying administrative sanction.

CR.2008.0125 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Vehicle License Suspension for Tailgating Upheld

This article on maintaining sufficient distance was cited as the breached rule justifying the sanction, although the main ground for the final order relies on the administrative sanction rules (Art. 16c LCR).

CR.2007.0189 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 de l’ordonnance du 13 novembre 1962 sur les règles de la circulation routière (OCR; RS 741.11))

License Suspension Upheld for Following Too Closely

Cited in the reasoning as the specific rule concerning the sufficient distance to be kept between following vehicles.

CR.2006.0470 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 de l’ordonnance fédérale du 13 novembre 1962 sur les règles de la circulation routière (OCR; RS 741.11))

License Suspension Upheld for Grave Tailgating Offense

Cited in the reasoning section as the specific rule detailing the requirement for sufficient following distance.

CR.2007.0125 · vd (art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Road Traffic Authority v. Appellant (License Withdrawal for Tailgating)

The court noted the violation of the specific requirement to maintain sufficient distance when vehicles are following each other.

CR.2006.0418 · vd (Art. 12 al. 1 OCR)

Driver License Suspension Upheld for Tailgating and Mobile Phone Use

This article was cited in the reasoning section establishing the breach (Section 3) which led to the decision, although not explicitly in the dispositive orders I or II, it is a ground for the decision upheld.