741.01
LVCR
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 3 LOI sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - Département en charge de la circulation routière [ 10, 14 ]
Chapitre I
Art. 3 LVCR · Département en charge de la circulation routière [ 10, 14 ]
1. Le département en charge de la circulation routière (ci-après : le département) [L] prend les décisions et les mesures en matière de circulation routière qui ne sont pas attribuées à une autre autorité par la présente loi ou ses dispositions d'exécution.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (77)
GE.2021.0068 · vd (Art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Challange to One-Way System and Paid Parking Regulations Upheld
The DGMR's decisions regarding traffic management and parking regulation were confirmed, based on this provision cited in the reasoning for the original decisions.
GE.2019.0142 · vd (Art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Municipality Appeal Against Refusal to Extend 30 km/h Speed Limit Zone Upheld
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the municipality's right to appeal against measures affecting traffic on its territory.
GE.2019.0047 · vd (art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Agricultural Operator v. Road Access Decision
The court annulled the decision because the measure imposing traffic limitations did not satisfy the principle of proportionality, which is established under this article.
GE.2017.0004 · vd (Art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Appeal Against Municipal One-Way Traffic Regulation Upheld
The court confirmed the decision based on the legal basis allowing restrictions to traffic flow to protect inhabitants and ensure safety, as discussed in the reasoning for rejecting the appeal.
GE.2017.0058 · vd (art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Property Owner v. Municipality on Shared Zone Regulation
This provision was cited to determine the legality of the measure establishing a traffic restriction zone based on local conditions and proportionality, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
GE.2015.0182 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LCR)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Pedestrian Zone Delivery Hours
Cited regarding the competence to regulate traffic, delegated to municipalities.
GE.2015.0182 · vd (art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Pedestrian Zone Delivery Hours
Cited as the basis for establishing traffic restrictions to protect inhabitants or other needs (e.g., safety, pollution control).
GE.2016.0179 · vd (Art. 3 al. 2 LCR)
Municipality v. Directorate of Mobility: Bridge Weight Restriction Appeal
Although cited in the reasoning to establish cantonal authority, it was not cited in the dispositive orders for the final decision.
GE.2016.0179 · vd (Art. 3 al. 3 LCR)
Municipality v. Directorate of Mobility: Bridge Weight Restriction Appeal
Although cited in the reasoning regarding the power to restrict traffic, it was not cited in the dispositive orders for the final decision.
GE.2016.0127 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LCR)
Property Owner Appeal of Road Signage Approval Denied Based on Public Safety Justification
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the cantonal and communal competence for regulating traffic.
GE.2016.0127 · vd (art. 3 al. 3 LCR)
Property Owner Appeal of Road Signage Approval Denied Based on Public Safety Justification
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the legal basis for prohibiting or restricting traffic on roads not open to general transit.
GE.2016.0127 · vd (art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Property Owner Appeal of Road Signage Approval Denied Based on Public Safety Justification
Cited in the reasoning section as the legal basis for issuing limitations or prescriptions to ensure safety or regulate traffic, requiring a balancing of interests.
GE.2015.0136 · vd (Art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Residents v. Municipality Regarding Parking Restriction and Road Safety
This provision on proportionality and justification for local traffic regulations underpins the reasoning that the municipal measure was inappropriate/dangerous.
GE.2013.0222 · vd (art. 3 al. 4 LCR)
Businesses v. Municipality on Experimental Traffic Measures
The need for the traffic measures, as required by this article, was not sufficiently established, contributing to the violation of proportionality.
GE.2012.0207 · vd (art. 3 al. 2 LCR)
Residents v. Municipality on Traffic Sign Relocation
Cited in the reasoning to establish cantonal competence for traffic regulation, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive.