741.01 LVCR

CH-VD

Art. 27 LOI sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - Communication des décisions et jugements [ 10, 14 ]

Chapitre IV

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (27 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 27 LVCR · Communication des décisions et jugements [ 10, 14 ]

1. Dans les limites arrêtées par le Conseil d'Etat, les autorités de répression mentionnées au chapitre III envoient au service une copie de leurs décisions et jugements rendus en application de la loi sur la circulation routière [A] , de la présente loi ou de leurs dispositions d'exécution.

← Art. 26a LVCR sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - Champ d'application [ 14 ] Art. 28 LVCR →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (47)

Jug.2022.457 · vd (Art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Owner Liability for Unidentified Traffic Offenses Upheld

Cited in the operative part (Order I) as one of the provisions the appellant was found guilty of violating.

Jug.2022.458 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Vehicle Owner Liability for Speeding Presumption Upheld

This substantive provision was cited in the dispositive as the basis for confirming the appellant's conviction.

444----------- · vd (art. 90 al. 2 LCR ad art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

State v. Appellant (Traffic Violations and Custodial Sentence Appeal)

Cited in the operative part as a legal basis for the judgment regarding serious traffic offenses.

Jug.2021.161 · vd (Art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Appeal Regarding Traffic Violation Conviction and Acquittal

This article justifies the acquittal on the charge of simple violation of traffic rules (Art. I of the dispositive).

Jug.2020.285 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Appellant v. State: Traffic Violations and Hit-and-Run Acquittal

The appellant was ultimately convicted for simple violation of traffic regulations based on this article.

Jug.2018.188 · vd (art. 27 al. 1er LCR)

Parking Violation Appeal Upheld Despite Health Claims

This provision establishes the obligation to comply with traffic signals and marks, which forms the substantive basis for upholding the conviction for illegal parking.

Jug.2018.59 · vd (Art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Traffic Violation Appeal: Factual Arbitrariness in Collision Determination

Cited in the dispositive reasoning as the basis for confirming the conviction for failing to yield priority.

Jug.2017.443 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Criminal Conviction and Sentence Upheld Despite Evidentiary Challenges

Cited in the preamble of the final orders as a legal basis for the decision.

CR.2016.0059 · vd (Art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Appeal Against Mandatory License Withdrawal After Traffic Accident

Cited as one of the violated rules underlying the finding of a serious violation.

Jug.2016.246 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Public Prosecutor v. Individual (Traffic Violation Degree)

This is cited as one of the legal provisions applied in the final orders, related to general traffic rules.

5.2016.PMR · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Comparative Negligence in Moped Accident Involving Impaired Rider and Negligent Driver

This provision regarding road markings was cited in the reasoning that established the serious fault of the defendant's insured driver, which was a primary basis for liability in Order I.

Jug.2016.26 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Traffic Violation Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Challenge to Factual Findings

This specific rule regarding compliance with signals and markings was violated, confirming the initial conviction.

CR.2015.0076 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 1ère phrase LCR)

License Withdrawal Due to Dangerous Driving and Prior Offenses

Cited in the reasoning to establish the violation of traffic signs (crossing the surface interdit au trafic), which is part of the facts justifying the decision, although not explicitly in the final orders as the main ground for the appeal's rejection.

CR.2015.0010 · vd (art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Motorist License Withdrawal Upheld for Ignoring Road Closure Signs

This provision established the underlying traffic violation (non-compliance with signals) which justified the administrative measure, although the application of the measure relied on Art. 16a LCR.

D.cision.2015.695 · vd (Art. 27 al. 1 LCR)

Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Visibility Defense Following Cyclist Injury

Cited in the preamble of the final orders as a basis for rejecting the appeal, confirming the conviction for traffic violation.