Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
741.01 LVCR CH-VD

Art. 26 LOI sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - Enlèvement des véhicules stationnés illicitement

Chapitre IV
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (27 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 26 LVCR · Enlèvement des véhicules stationnés illicitement

1. Tout véhicule dont l'arrêt ou le stationnement est contraire aux prescriptions, qui gêne la circulation, la met en danger, ou qui occupe indûment une place peut être, si le conducteur ne peut être atteint ou s'il refuse d'obtempérer aux injonctions de la police, des voyers ou des cantonniers, déplacé par ceux-ci, sous la responsabilité et aux frais du conducteur ou du détenteur du véhicule.

← Art. 25 LVCR sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - Champ d'application [ 14 ] Art. 26a LVCR →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (38)

7----------- · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Appellate Court Upholds Constraint and Obstruction Convictions for Demonstration Blockade
This article defines the obligation to behave in traffic so as not to hinder others, which supports the violation leading to the conviction under Art. 90 al. 1 LCR.
846----------- · vd (Art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Criminal Complaint Pending Resolution of Appellant's Traffic Violation Conviction
This provision was cited in the header, but its application relates to the substantive analysis of the road safety duty, which was ultimately deferred pending the outcome of another case.
416----------- · vd (art. 90 al. 1 en relation avec l’art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
State v. Protestor Obstruction
This article combination defines the offense of simple violation of traffic rules, which was confirmed in the operative part.
302----------- · vd (Art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Appellants v. Police Tribunal (Obstruction of Service and Resistance)
This article was used as part of the legal basis for affirming the conviction for a simple violation of traffic rules in the final orders.
281----------- · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Unauthorized Demonstration Convictions Upheld Despite Joinder Request
This provision related to the misuse of traffic routes was retained in the confirmed judgment, in ideal concurrence with other articles.
Jug.2022.349 · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Unauthorized Protest Obstruction Conviction Affirmed
The article is cited in the operative part (dispositive) as part of the legal basis for confirming the conviction for simple violation of traffic rules.
95----------- · vd (Art. 26 al. 1, 49 al. 2 LCR)
Appeal Dismissed: Conviction Upheld for Obstruction During Unauthorized Demonstration
These articles were cited in the final operative part (II) regarding the offences of which the appellant was found guilty.
31----------- · vd (90 al. 1 en relation avec l’art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Strike Participants Convicted for Obstructing Public Services Upheld on Appeal
Confirmed the conviction for simple traffic violation.
Jug.2021.108 · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld Despite Exclusion of Video Evidence
Cited in the application section (dispositive) as a provision violated, leading to the confirmation of the conviction for simple violation of traffic rules.
Jug.2021.76 · vd (Art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Traffic Violation Conviction Upheld on Credibility of Testimony
Cited in the final orders as a provision establishing the underlying offense for which the appeal was rejected.
Jug.2019.330 · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Traffic Violation Appeal Affirming Conviction for Dangerous Overtaking
This provision was used to confirm the conviction for serious violation of traffic rules (obligation not to impede or endanger others).
Jug.2019.164 · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Public Prosecutor v. Individual on Serious Traffic Violation
Cited as a general duty in traffic, related to the conduct underlying the violation established in order II.
D.cision.2019.215 · vd (Art. 26 al. 2 LCR)
Review of Decision Not to Open Investigation Following Traffic Accident Involving Right of Way Dispute
The appeal was admitted because the court found that the defendant might have violated the specific duty of care required by this article in relation to the priority rules at the roundabout.
Jug.2018.194 · vd (art. 26 al. 1, 27 al. 1, 31 al. 1, 32 al. 1 LCR)
State v. Appellant (Traffic Violations and Reckless Overtaking)
Traffic rules whose violation was confirmed as part of the aggravated offense under Art. 90 al. 3 LCR.
Jug.2017.443 · vd (art. 26 al. 1 LCR)
Criminal Conviction and Sentence Upheld Despite Evidentiary Challenges
Cited in the preamble of the final orders as a legal basis for the decision.