741.01
LVCR
CH-VD
Art. 17 LOI sur la circulation routière (LVCR) - d) Montant maximum de l'amende [ 2, 8, 12 ]
Chapitre III
Art. 17 LVCR · d) Montant maximum de l'amende [ 2, 8, 12 ]
1. En dérogation à la loi sur les contraventions, l'autorité municipale peut prononcer contre chaque contrevenant, même en l'absence de récidive, une amende de 1'000 francs au maximum.
2. L'autorité municipale doit se dessaisir en faveur de l'autorité préfectorale ou du Ministère public si l'infraction commise lui paraît devoir entraîner une peine excédant sa compétence.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (594)
CR.2024.0019 · vd (art. 17 al. 5 LCR)
License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Breach of Abstinence Condition
The appeal was rejected because the administrative authority was justified in applying this article to revoke the driving license due to non-compliance with the conditions imposed for its maintenance (abstinence).
CR.2024.0021 · vd (art. 17 al. 5 LCR)
Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Breach of Post-Return Condition (Cocaine Use)
The primary justification for rejecting the appeal and confirming the decision was the violation of the conditions imposed under this article following the initial withdrawal.
CR.2023.0009 · vd (Art. 17 al. 4 2e phr. LCR)
Appeal Against Indefinite Driving License Withdrawal for Recidivist Speeding Felony
This provision defines the conditions for restoring a license after a withdrawal based on Art. 16d al. 3 let. b LCR, which the court confirmed as applicable.
CR.2023.0018 · vd (art. 17 al. 5 LCR)
Motorist License Revocation Upheld for Failure to Comply with Psychiatric Conditions
Cited as the primary legal basis for confirming the security withdrawal of the driving license due to non-compliance with prior conditions.
CR.2021.0041 · vd (art. 17 al. 5 LCR)
Driving License Withdrawal Upheld Due to Alcohol Dependence
The court noted that the license withdrawal was also justified under this article because the applicant previously violated the conditions for license restoration related to controlled alcohol consumption.
CR.2021.0037 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
License Withdrawal Appeal After Conditional Restoration for DUI
Cited to establish the possibility of restoring an indefinitely withdrawn license under certain conditions (charges), which is the core of the decision regarding restitution.
CR.2021.0037 · vd (art. 17 al. 5 LCR)
License Withdrawal Appeal After Conditional Restoration for DUI
Cited as the legal basis allowing permit withdrawal if post-restitution conditions are not observed, which justifies the initial administrative decision being appealed.
CR.2021.0017 · vd (art. 17 al. 4 LCR)
Appeal Regarding Indefinite License Withdrawal Upheld Despite Medication Defense
This provision was used to confirm the decision regarding the conditions for the restitution of the driving license.
CR.2020.0028 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Appeal Dismissed Against Indefinite Driving License Withdrawal Due to Alcohol Dependency and Seizures
Cited in the reasoning to explain the conditions for the potential restitution of a license previously withdrawn for an indefinite period.
CR.2020.0035 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Driver License Withdrawal Upheld Despite No Clinical Dependency Finding
This article was used to confirm the proportionality of imposing conditions (charges) for the restitution of an indefinitely withdrawn license.
CR.2020.0019 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Driver License Restitution Condition Upheld After Multiple DUIs
Cited extensively in the reasoning section to analyze the substance of the case regarding the conditions for restoring driving privileges, but it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders I through IV.
CR.2020.0007 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Appellant v. Authority Regarding Driving License Restoration Conditions
This provision governs the conditions for restoring a driving license withdrawn for an indefinite period, which is the core issue addressed in the partially admitted appeal regarding the methylphenidate abstinence condition.
CR.2020.0005 · vd (art. 14 al. 1, art. 14 al. 2 let. c, art. 16 al. 1, art. 16d al. 1 let. b et art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Applicant v. State: Driving License Retention and Mandatory Abstinence Period
Cited as the legal basis for driver aptitude requirements and the conditions for lifting an indeterminate license withdrawal due to addiction.
CR.2019.0030 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
License Restoration Condition Upheld Due to Repeated Drunk Driving Violations
This provision justifies confirming the conditions imposed on the appellant for the restitution of the driving license after a withdrawal for indeterminate duration due to dependency.
CR.2018.0021 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LCR)
Refusal of Conditional Driving License Return Due to Recidivism and Drug Use History
This provision was cited to confirm that the withdrawal of the security license implicitly requires proof that the inaptitude has disappeared, justifying the conditions imposed by the authority.