725.01 LROU

CH-VD

Art. 32 LOI sur les routes (LRou) - Accès

Chapitre V

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (66 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 32 LRou · Accès

1. L'aménagement d'un accès privé aux routes cantonales est soumis à autorisation du département; pour les routes communales, l'autorisation est délivrée par la municipalité.

2. L'autorisation n'est donnée que si l'accès est indispensable pour les besoins du fonds, s'il correspond à l'usage commun de la route, en particulier s'il n'en résulte pas d'inconvénient pour la fluidité ou la sécurité du trafic, et si l'accès envisagé s'intègre à l'aménagement du territoire et à l'environnement.

3. Les frais de l'ouvrage incombent au propriétaire intéressé.

4. L'autorité compétente peut, notamment dans le but d'améliorer la visibilité de l'accès d'un fonds riverain, prendre les mesures nécessaires à l'égard des propriétaires des fonds voisins; une participation aux frais de ces mesures peut alors être exigée du bénéficiaire de celles-ci.

← Art. 31 LRou sur les routes (LRou) - Champ d'application Art. 33 LRou →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)

AC.2025.0189 · vd (art. 32 LRou)

Property Owner v. Road Authority (Building Permit Refusal)

Basis for requiring special authorization for an access to a cantonal road and the conditions for granting it.

AC.2024.0116 · vd (Art. 32 LRou)

Construction Permit Annulment Due to Traffic Safety and Planning Violations

The access to the garage ramp was not admitted under road legislation, forming a ground for admitting the appeal.

AC.2024.0181 · vd (art. 32 LRou)

Applicants v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Rejection Over Green Space and Aesthetic Standards

The court confirmed the municipal decision to refuse the building permit based on insufficient road access criteria, including non-compliance with visibility requirements for this article.

AC.2024.0012 · vd (Art. 32 LRou)

Municipality v. Cantonal Authority Regarding Road Access Safety Standards

This article provides the substantive conditions under which the required special authorization must be granted or refused, forming the basis for confirming the initial refusal.

AC.2020.0265 · vd (Art. 32 LRou)

Municipal Building Permit Challenge and Zoning Compliance

Cited in the reasoning (Considerant 6) to govern the creation of private access to a public road, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.

AC.2020.0115 · vd (Art. 32 al. 2 LRou)

Villa Owners' Appeal for Building Permit Denied Due to Traffic Safety Concerns

The rejection of the appeal is implicitly based on the failure to meet the requirement of this article concerning traffic fluidity and safety, which overrides the private interest.

AC.2018.0403 · vd (art. 32 LRou)

Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Unsafe Vehicle Access Gradient and Visibility

The appeal was admitted because the projected access failed to respect the security requirements for connecting to a public road, as stipulated in this article.

AC.2016.0160 · vd (Art. 32 de la loi du 10 décembre 1991 sur les routes (LRou; RSV 735.01))

Applicant v. Municipality Regarding Refused Building Permit for Storage Depot

The municipality must verify compliance with this road law concerning vehicle maneuvering and exit, if necessary.

AC.2015.0218 · vd (art. 32 al. 2 LRou; RSV 725.01)

Residents' Challenge to Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Rejected

This provision was cited to show that the alternative access to the cantonal road would likely have been rejected because the access via Rue Jolimont was deemed possible.

AC.2015.0192 · vd (art. 32 al. 2 LRou)

Appeal Against Building Permit Due to Insufficient Road Access and Procedural Flaws

Cited in the reasoning to indicate that the municipality must rule on the admissibility of the private accesses to the communal road under this provision.

AC.2013.0431 · vd (art. 32 LRou)

Appeal Against Refusal of Building Permit Modification and Tree Felling

This provision was the main ground for rejecting the appeal, as the requested access did not meet the conditions of indispensability and safety set out in its second paragraph.

AC.2012.0182 · vd (Art. 32 LRou)

Municipal Permit Annulment for Building Envelope and Setback Violations

The court ruled that the assessment of the access point to the cantonal road by the Road Service (Service des routes) did not fully consider all conditions (indispensability, environmental protection) required by this article, leading to the annulment.

AC.2011.0297 · vd (art. 32 al. 1 LRou)

Owners v. Road Service (Improper Procedure for Road Connection Permit)

Cited in the reasoning to indicate the correct authorization procedure that should have been followed.

AC.2011.0211 · vd (art. 32 de la loi cantonale du 10 décembre 1991 sur les routes (LRou; RSV 725.01))

Neighbors' Appeal of Building Permit Based on Road Capacity, Aesthetics, and View Obstruction

Cited in the reasoning concerning access authorization requirements, but not in the dispositive, therefore excluded.

AC.2010.0225 · vd (art. 32 LRou)

Appeal Against Building Permit Approval for Mixed-Use Development Due to Procedural Flaws and Insufficient Environmental Justification

Cited in the reasoning regarding the authorization required from the municipality for creating a private access to a communal road.