710.01
LE
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 33 LOI sur l'expropriation (LE) - Offres de l'expropriant
Titre III, Chapitre II
Art. 33 LE · Offres de l'expropriant
1. En même temps qu'il désigne les assesseurs, le président fixe à l'expropriant un délai de trente jours pour indiquer la valeur vénale de base qu'il offre de payer pour les immeubles.
2. L'expropriant peut articuler des offres plus détaillées ou plus étendues.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)
FO.2024.0012 · vd (art. 33 lettre i de la loi sur le Tribunal administratif fédéral)
Heirs' Succession Dispute and Denial of Agricultural Payments
Cited as the legal basis for the possibility of appealing this cantonal decision to the Federal Administrative Court.
CR.2024.0042 · vd (Art. 33 al. 1 let. a du règlement du 16 novembre 2016 sur les émoluments perçus par le SAN (RE-SAN; BLV 741.15.1))
Applicant v. Administrative Authority Regarding License Withdrawal and Fee
This article was cited to justify the legitimacy and proportionality of the 200 francs fee imposed in the administrative decision, which the court upheld in the dispositive.
CR.2022.0004 · vd (Art. 33 al. 1 let. a du règlement du 16 novembre 2016 sur les émoluments perçus par le SAN (RE-SAN; BLV 741.15.1))
Vehicle Registration Withdrawal and Administrative Fee Dispute
This provision establishes the 200 Fr. fee applied to the appellant for the decision to withdraw the circulation permit and plates, which the court confirmed.
GE.2009.0047 · vd (art. 33 de la loi d'introduction dans le Canton de Vaud du Code civil suisse du 30 novembre 1920 (LVCC; RSV 211.01))
Foundation Board Members Fined for Non-Compliance; Fines Annulled Due to Lack of Legal Basis for Individual Liability
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cantonal organization of foundation oversight, but not in the operative orders.
FI.2008.0041 · vd (art. 33 de la loi d'introduction dans le Canton de Vaud du Code civil suisse du 30 novembre 1920 (LVCC; RSVD 211.01))
Foundation Supervisory Fee Legality Challenge
Cited in the reasoning regarding the delegation of organization of supervision, but not cited in the final orders (I-IV).
CR.2006.0147 · vd (art. 33 al. 1bis du règlement du 7 juillet 2004 sur les émoluments perçus par le service des automobiles et de la navigation (RE-SAN))
Administrator v. Transportation Authority: Vehicle Registration Plate Transfer Dispute
This provision was interpreted to allow the transfer of license plates from the company to the appellant, justifying the admission of the appeal.
PE.2006.0246 · vd (art. 33 de l'Ordonnance du Conseil fédéral du 6 octobre 1986 limitant le nombre des étrangers (OLE))
Moroccan National's Residency Appeal Denied Despite Mental Health Concerns
Cited in the reasoning section (3c) to assess whether temporary residence for medical treatment was justified, supporting the final decision to reject the appeal.
PE.2004.0598 · vd (Art. 33 de l'Ordonnance du 6 octobre 1986 limitant le nombre des étrangers (OLE; RS 823.21))
Algerian National v. Switzerland: Refusal of Medical Residence Permit Upheld
Cited in the reasoning to evaluate the grounds for granting a residence permit for medical reasons, although the ultimate rejection was based on the failure to meet these conditions.
PE.2002.0085 · vd (article 33 de l'Ordonnance du 6 octobre 1986 limitant le nombre des étrangers (OLE))
Mauritian National Denied Stay Extension Due to Undisclosed Purpose of Visit
This provision was cited by the administrative authority (SPOP) in its decision (D) as not being met.
PE.1998.0378 · vd (art. 33 de l'ordonnance du 6 octobre 1986 limitant le nombre des étrangers (OLE))
Foreign National's Appeal for Residence Permit Denied Despite Marriage and Divorce Due to Prior Immigration and Criminal Offenses
Although the court concluded that the conditions under this article were not met, it was specifically invoked and discussed as a potential basis for granting the residence permit in the reasoning leading up to the final decision.
AC.1992.0173 · vd (art. 33 du règlement communal sur le plan d'extension et la police des constructions (RPE))
Nature Protection Leagues v. Municipality: Zoning Compliance for Land Use Conversion
The project was prohibited because it was not in conformity with the vocation of the zone, as defined by this article.