700.11
LATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 92 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Consolidation ou démolition
Titre IX, Chapitre II
Art. 92 LATC · Consolidation ou démolition
1. La municipalité ordonne la consolidation, le cas échéant la démolition, de tout ouvrage menaçant ruine ou présentant un danger pour le public ou les habitants.
2. Les mesures prescrites par la municipalité sont communiquées par écrit au propriétaire et au locataire ou à l'occupant. La municipalité désigne la personne à qui elles incombent et fixe le délai d'exécution.
3. En cas d'urgence ou si les travaux ordonnés ne sont pas exécutés dans le délai imparti, la municipalité les fait exécuter aux frais du propriétaire.
4. En cas de carence de la municipalité, le département peut prendre les mesures prévues aux alinéas 1 à 3.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (25)
AC.2023.0431 · vd (Art. 92 LATC)
New Owners' Liability for Prior Owner's Retaining Wall Repairs
Although mentioned in the reasoning as being similar to Art. 35 al. 2 phrase 2 LRou, it was not cited in the dispositive orders.
AC.2023.0103 · vd (art. 92 LATC)
Building Evacuation Appeal Due to Structural Instability
Cited as the main provision regarding the municipal power to order consolidation or demolition of dangerous structures.
AC.2023.0103 · vd (art. 92 al. 1 à 3 LATC)
Building Evacuation Appeal Due to Structural Instability
Cited in the context of the appellants' conclusion II bis regarding the substitution of the DGTL for the municipality.
AC.2022.0414 · vd (art. 92 al. 1 LATC)
Municipality's Occupancy Permit Refusal Annulled for Lack of Legal Basis and Documentation
The court indicated that future enforcement orders might be based on this article concerning the consolidation or demolition of structures presenting a danger to the public or inhabitants.
AC.2019.0002 · vd (Art. 92 al. 1 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; BLV 700.11))
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Roofing Tile Mandate
This article was cited in the background reasoning to justify the initial municipal order for roof repair due to danger, but it was not cited in the final dispositive orders (I-IV).
AC.2017.0391 · vd (art. 92 LATC)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Retaining Wall Authorization Dismissed Due to Preclusion and Imminent Danger Justification
The Municipal authority was justified in ordering the consolidation work based on this provision, which addresses the consolidation of structures posing a danger.
AC.2018.0209 · vd (art. 92 al. 1 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Ruinous Roof Repair Order
Used to confirm that the situation concerning the roof state constituted works 'menaçant ruine ou présentant un danger pour le public ou les habitants' (threatening ruin or presenting a danger to the public or inhabitants), justifying the municipal order.
AC.2016.0170 · vd (art. 92 LATC)
Owner Appeal of Municipal Demolition Order
The basis for the municipal order concerning the consolidation or demolition of structures threatening to collapse or endangering public safety.
AC.2016.0373 · vd (Art. 92 LATC)
Appeal on Building Permit Refusal and Municipal Order to Resume Work
The court found that the order to resume work was not properly founded under this article, as the municipality failed to clearly state that it was ordering consolidation or demolition due to danger.
AC.2012.0374 · vd (Art. 92 LATC)
Property Owner Appeal of Municipal Safety Order for Retaining Wall Replacement
The court confirmed that the municipality acted within its powers under this article by ordering the construction of garage D as a precautionary safety measure for the retaining wall.
AC.2013.0202 · vd (art. 92 LATC)
Usufructuary Liability for Fire Safety Violations by Squatters
The court confirmed the municipality's application of this article to require measures against public safety risks.
AC.2012.0376 · vd (article 92 al. 3 LATC)
Owners v. Municipality (Property Safety Order Modification)
Cited in order II to maintain the provision regarding execution by substitution for the measures upheld (a to c).
AC.2009.0281 · vd (art. 92 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality: Building Permit Revoked for Violation of Conservation Zoning
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the legal standard for demolition due to ruinous state, but not directly used in the final orders.
AC.2007.0317 · vd (Art. 92 al. 1 à 3 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality regarding Demolition Order Jurisdiction
These subsections define the measures (consolidation or demolition) that the department may take in the situation described under Art. 92 al. 4 LATC.
AC.2007.0317 · vd (Art. 92 al. 4 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality regarding Demolition Order Jurisdiction
The court found the municipality's position amounted to a failure ('carence') under this article, leading to the conclusion that the cantonal department should decide on demolition or consolidation.