Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
700.11 LATC CH-VD

Art. 58 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Principe

Titre VI, Chapitre I
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 58 LATC · Principe

1. Le service peut subventionner

a. les plans directeurs intercommunaux d'importance régionale, les projets d'agglomérations et leurs adaptations ainsi que les études sur lesquelles ils se basent ;

b. les études d'aménagement du territoire nécessaires à l'élaboration de planifications stratégiques d'intérêt cantonal.

← Art. 57 LATC sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Buts Art. 59 LATC →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (44)

AC.2018.0067 · vd (art. 58 al. 3 LATC)
Recurrents v. Municipality (Land Use Plan Modification for Waste Site and Business Expansion)
Mentioned in the legal reasoning regarding the procedure for adopting the plan, which implies the basis for the procedural annulment (failure to rule on the regulation).
AC.2018.0067 · vd (art. 58 al. 4 LATC)
Recurrents v. Municipality (Land Use Plan Modification for Waste Site and Business Expansion)
Mentioned in the legal reasoning regarding the procedure for transmitting the plan to the SDT for approval, relevant to the procedural failure identified.
AC.2015.0219 · vd (art. 58 al. 2 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hillside Zoning Near Historical Site
Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's preparatory measures for the council's decision, which sets the procedural context.
AC.2015.0219 · vd (art. 58 al. 3 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Hillside Zoning Near Historical Site
Cited in the reasoning regarding the commune council's decision-making process on objections, which sets the procedural context.
AC.2015.0227 · vd (art. 58 al. 2 LATC)
Appellants v. Municipality Zoning Reclassification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's report to the communal council.
AC.2015.0227 · vd (art. 58 al. 3 LATC)
Appellants v. Municipality Zoning Reclassification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the communal council's role in ruling on oppositions.
AC.2015.0212 · vd (art. 58 al. 2 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Zoning Reclassification and Biotopes Protection)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's duty to establish a preliminary report for the communal council.
AC.2015.0212 · vd (art. 58 al. 3 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipal Council (Zoning Reclassification and Biotopes Protection)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the communal council's competence to rule on objections.
AC.2016.0129 · vd (art. 58 LATC)
Municipality v. Environmental Department Zoning Appeal
This procedural article on the communal council's decision after public inquiry was mentioned in the reasoning, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
AC.2015.0006 · vd (Art. 58 LATC)
Property Owners v. Neighborhood Development Plan Adoption
The court maintained the decision of the Municipal Council which adopted the neighborhood plan, as referenced in the context of the contested decision.
AC.2015.0188 · vd (art. 58 al. 5 LATC)
Appellant's Zoning Challenge Barred by Untimely Objection
This provision was cited as the main ground for declaring the appeal inadmissible because the objections raised during the complementary inquiry related to elements not subject to that inquiry.
AC.2015.0256 · vd (Art. 58 al. 1 LATC)
Appellants v. Municipal Council (Right to be Heard Violation in Development Plan Modification)
The court annulled the decisions due to their violation of the right to be heard concerning the required conciliation hearing.
AC.2014.0385 · vd (Art. 58 al. 3 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Road Redevelopment and Traffic Calming Measures Upheld
Cited in the reasoning (point 2.b) when discussing procedural compliance regarding the municipal council's decision on oppositions and plan adoption, even though the final orders did not explicitly mandate adherence to it for the decision itself.
AC.2013.0153 · vd (Art. 58 LATC)
Municipality Upheld in Denying Permit Due to Zoning Conflict
Cited in the reasoning regarding the competent authority for changing a parcel's zoning designation, used to reject the good faith argument.
AC.2011.0177 · vd (Art. 58 al. 4 LATC)
Adoption of Land-Use Plan for Excavation Deposit Upheld with Modifications for Environmental Controls
Cited by analogy in the dispositive to allow the Court to directly introduce modifications to the PPA regulation during the final approval procedure.