700.11
LATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 46 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Zones réservées
Titre III, Chapitre II, Section IV
Art. 46 LATC · Zones réservées
1. Les communes ou le département peuvent établir des zones réservées selon l'article 27 LAT [A] . Ces zones interdisent ou limitent la constructibilité de terrains pendant une période maximale de cinq ans, pouvant être prolongée de trois ans au maximum.
2. La procédure d'approbation est celle des plans d'affectation.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (65)
AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone
This provision was cited in the request for establishing the zone réservée (ZR) and is the basis for the decision being challenged and ultimately confirmed by rejecting the appeal.
AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)
Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone
Cited in the reasoning in connection with the local implementation of ZR provisions.
AC.2024.0043 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)
Heirs v. Cantonal Authority on Reserved Zone Extension
The main ground for confirming the decision was the sufficient legal basis provided by this article for the provisional establishment and prolongation of the cantonal reserved zone.
AC.2023.0429 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Landowners Appeal Denial of Building Permit for ISOS Site Due to Impending Zoning Revision
Cited in jurisprudence related to the mandatory application of art. 49 LATC concerning reserved zones.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
Cited as the basis for the cantonal department's decision concerning the approval of the reserve zone plan.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
The decision being appealed involved the approval of a reserve zone plan, which is governed by this article.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
Cited in the reasoning to define the duration and possibility of extension for reserve zones under Vaudois law.
AC.2022.0114 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Reserved Zone Approval
Cited in the reasoning regarding the legal basis for zone réservée, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
AC.2023.0342 · vd (art. 46 al. 1 LATC, en lien avec l'art. 27 al. 2 LAT)
Cantonal Land Reservation Extension Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
This provision constitutes the legal basis for the prolongation of the cantonal reserved zone, which was the subject of the dispute and confirmed in the final order.
AC.2023.0345 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)
Owner Appeal Against Cantonal Zone Extension Overlapping Municipal Zone
The court's decision to annul the extension of the cantonal reserved zone is based on the provincial law concerning reserved zones, which the court deemed incompatible with federal law.
AC.2022.0348 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)
Property Owner v. Canton: Reserved Zone Plan Challenge
The court's reasoning, which ultimately rejected the appeal, was based on confirming that the reserved zone plan complied with the cantonal equivalent of Art. 27 LAT.
AC.2022.0320 · vd (Art. 46 LATC)
Property Owners Challenge Reserved Zone Plan Permissiveness
Cited in the reasoning as the cantonal law counterpart to Art. 27 LAT regarding the establishment of reserved zones, which the court ultimately found was not violated.
AC.2022.0322 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Challenge to Communal Reserved Zone Plan and Cantonal Approval
The court confirmed the decision regarding the reserved zone, which falls under the procedure described in this article.
AC.2022.0339 · vd (Art. 46 ss LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality and Canton on Reserved Zone Inclusion
The court annulled the decisions because the application of conservatory measures (Art. 46 ss LATC) to the parcel was contrary to the instructions given in the previous cantonal court ruling.
AC.2022.0324 · vd (art. 46 LATC)
Property Owner Challenge to Municipal Reserved Zone Plan Dismissed
This cantonal provision concerning the establishment of reserved zones was cited as the procedural basis for the administrative decisions under review.