Art. 31 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Zones à protéger

AC.2017.0028 · vd (art. 31 al. 1 LATC)

Building Permit Denial for Mixed-Use Facility in Artisan Zone

Cited in reasoning regarding cantonal master plans, but not used as a ground for the final order.

AC.2017.0028 · vd (art. 31 al. 2 LATC)

Building Permit Denial for Mixed-Use Facility in Artisan Zone

Cited in reasoning regarding regional master plans, but not used as a ground for the final order.

AC.2014.0426 · vd (Art. 31 al. 1 LATC)

Property Owner v. Neighborhood Plan Approval and Land Consolidation Scheme Validity

Cited in the reasoning section concerning the binding force of the cantonal master plan (plan directeur cantonal).

AC.2014.0426 · vd (Art. 31 al. 2 LATC)

Property Owner v. Neighborhood Plan Approval and Land Consolidation Scheme Validity

Cited in the reasoning section concerning the limited binding force of the PALM regarding land use zoning.

AF.2014.0001 · vd (art. 31 al. 1 LATC)

Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Consolidation Valuation)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of the cantonal master plan.

AF.2014.0001 · vd (art. 31 al. 2 LATC)

Property Owner v. Classification Commission (Land Consolidation Valuation)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of the cantonal master plan versus other planning documents.

AC.2014.0013 · vd (art. 31 al. 2 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; RSV 700.11))

Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Deficiencies

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of PDL, but not explicitly used in the final orders (II to VI). Exclusion based on strict rule.

AC.2011.0176 · vd (art. 31 al. 1 LATC)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Administrative Building and Parking Facility Dismissed for Lack of Standing

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of the cantonal master plan.

AC.2008.0334 · vd (art. 31 al. 1 LATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality: Building Permit Parking Density and Road Access

Cited in the reasoning regarding the binding nature of the cantonal development plan, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I to V).

AC.2008.0334 · vd (art. 31 al. 2 LATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality: Building Permit Parking Density and Road Access

Cited in the reasoning regarding the reference nature of communal development plans, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (I to V).

AC.2007.0031 · vd (Art. 31 al. 2 LATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit Confirmation Based on Master Plan and Aesthetic Concerns

This article was cited to establish that the communal master plan (referenced by Art. 4 RPGA) is not legally binding, a factor used to reject the appeal ground based on the master plan's silhouette protection objective.

AC.2007.0200 · vd (Art. 31 LATC)

Property Owners Challenge Regional Road Project Approval

The court mentioned this article to confirm that the Cantonal Master Plan's coordination program, which binds authorities, remains in effect.

AC.2002.0002 · vd (art. 31 al. 3 LATC)

Property Owners v. Administration (Land Charge Scope on Agricultural Parcel)

The court reformed the challenged decision based on the clear text of this provision regarding the scope of the servitude on property.