700.11 LATC

CH-VD

Art. 17 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Etablissement

Titre III, Chapitre I

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 17 LATC · Etablissement

1. Une ou plusieurs municipalités peuvent établir un plan directeur couvrant tout ou partie du territoire d'une ou de plusieurs communes.

2. L'établissement d'un plan directeur communal est obligatoire pour les communes qui se trouvent dans un périmètre compact d'agglomération, pour les centres cantonaux ainsi que les centres régionaux, selon la liste du plan directeur cantonal.

3. Un plan directeur intercommunal ou régional peut satisfaire à l'obligation de l'alinéa précédent à condition que la partie stratégique du plan intercommunal ou régional soit adoptée par les conseils communaux ou généraux des communes concernées, la partie opérationnelle demeurant de la compétence des municipalités des communes concernées. Le plan est approuvé par le Conseil d'Etat. Il est contraignant pour les autorités cantonales et communales.

4. Le Conseil d'Etat peut fixer un délai aux communes qui n'ont pas établi de plan directeur conformément aux alinéas précédents, lorsque des circonstances particulières le justifient.

5. La municipalité soumet le plan à une consultation publique pendant trente jours au moins. Elle établit et rend public un rapport de consultation.

← Art. 16 LATC sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Buts Art. 18 LATC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (28)

AC.2018.0123 · vd (art. 17 LATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality: Zoning Violation in Residential Conversion

Cited in conjunction with art. 3.1 RC to support the argument that municipal authorities must enforce legal and regulatory provisions.

AC.2016.0164 · vd (Art. 17 et 104 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; RSV 700.11))

Municipality v. Appellant: Permit Denial Based on Zoning Non-Compliance

Cited in the reasoning to establish the competence of the municipality for building permits, which underpins the decision.

AC.2014.0031 · vd (art. 17 al. 1 LATC)

Association v. Municipality on Chalet Construction Permit

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the municipality's duty to enforce legal and regulatory provisions.

AC.2014.0031 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LATC)

Association v. Municipality on Chalet Construction Permit

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the municipality's verification of project conformity before issuing a building permit.

AC.2015.0135 · vd (Art. 17 LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Annulment of Demolition Ban on Architecturally Interesting Villa

Cited by the court as the basis for municipal competence in applying land use planning rules relevant to construction aesthetic and integration.

AC.2014.0387 · vd (art. 17 LATC)

Fence Demolition Order Modification Due to Permit Violation and Zoning Conflict

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the municipality is the competent authority for building permits, thus linking any assurances from municipal employees to the municipality's scope.

AC.2014.0376 · vd (art. 17 et 104 LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Demolition Permit Refusal Based on Non-Binding Heritage Opinion

These provisions concerning the municipality's competence in applying communal rules for built heritage protection were cited in the reasoning supporting the assessment of the municipality's error.

AC.2012.0238 · vd (art. 17 al. 1 LATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Terrace and Retaining Wall

Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's duties, but not explicitly in the final dispositive orders I, II, or III.

AC.2012.0202 · vd (Art. 17 et 104 LATC)

Municipality Refusal Based on Faulty Heritage Authorization Requirement

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the municipality's primary competence to apply communal protection rules.

AC.2012.0176 · vd (art. 17 et 104 LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Photovoltaic Panel Permit Refusal)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's primary role in applying communal protection rules.

AC.2011.0291 · vd (art. 17 LATC)

State Department Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit Derogation

The appellant argued that the decision violated this article by improperly authorizing construction in a zone not intended for it.

AC.2011.0295 · vd (art. 17 et 104 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC, RSV 700.11))

Municipal Refusal of Building Permit Appeal for Basement Conversion Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the municipality, not municipal officials, has the competence to issue building permits, refuting the good faith argument.

AC.2009.0253 · vd (Art. 17 LATC (RSV 700.11))

Appeal Against Building Permit for Villa Regarding Height Calculation

Cited within the reasoning for context regarding the municipality's obligation to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

AC.2007.0322 · vd (art. 17 LATC)

Demolition Order Upheld for Unauthorized Reconstruction on Agricultural Land

Cited in the reasoning regarding the exemplary conduct expected of the appellant as a municipal, which supports the finding of bad faith in the proportionality assessment.

AC.2008.0032 · vd (art. 17 al. 3 LATC)

Recipients v. Municipality (Mootness of Appeal after Revised Road Service Authorization)

Cited in the reasoning to establish municipal competence for building permits, but not in the dispositive.