700.11
LATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 134 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Plans d'affectation non conformes
Titre XI
Art. 134 LATC · Plans d'affectation non conformes
1. Dans les communes ayant un plan d'affectation et un règlement non conformes aux dispositions de la loi, ce plan et ce règlement s'appliquent avec les restrictions suivantes
a. dans les zones à bâtir, le département peut s'opposer à la délivrance d'un permis de construire s'il s'agit d'une zone manifestement trop étendue, ne répondant pas aux critères des articles 48 et 51 ; dans ce cas, l'Etat doit, dans les trois mois qui suivent son opposition, soumettre à l'enquête publique une zone réservée ;
b. hors des zones à bâtir, notamment dans les zones sans affectation spéciale, la délivrance de tout permis de construire est subordonnée à l'autorisation préalable du département, qui statue conformément aux articles 81 et 120, lettre a.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 134 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
The court analyzed whether the appealed decision violated the criteria for building permit supervision under this article, framing the rejection of the appellant's related argument.
AC.2023.0267 · vd (art. 134 al. 1 let. a LATC)
Appeal Regarding Provisional Reserved Zone for Land-Use Plan Revision
Cited as the legal basis under which the department can oppose the issuance of a building permit if the zone is manifestly too extensive.
AC.2018.0440 · vd (Art. 134 LATC)
Cantonal Reserved Zone Overrides Municipal Building Permit
This provision formed the legal basis for the canton's ability to oppose the building permit due to the manifestly oversized building zone.
AC.2018.0361 · vd (art. 134 LATC)
Cantonal Reserved Zone Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
Cited to justify cantonal intervention when a municipality's plan is non-compliant with the law, allowing the department to oppose building permits in excessively large zones and establish a reserved zone.
AC.2017.0237 · vd (art. 134 LATC)
Territorial Department v. Municipality on Construction Permit Validity Based on Former Zoning Law
Cited in the reasoning as an additional basis for opposition by the department, although its specific application was deemed unnecessary.
AC.2017.0388 · vd (Art. 134 LATC)
Cantonal Reserve Upheld Despite Municipal Zoning Process
The cantonal reserved zone was established using the authority granted by this article, as mentioned in the facts (Section F).
AC.2016.0266 · vd (art. 134 LATC)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Building Permit for Residential Development Adjacent to Agricultural Land
Cited regarding the department's power to oppose a permit in building zones deemed manifestly too extensive.
AC.2016.0420 · vd (Art. 77 et 134 LATC)
Property Owner v. Cantonal Authority on Reserved Zone for Undeveloped Land
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the SDT's opposition against the building permit application, relating to the over-dimensioning of buildable areas.
AC.1996.0011 · vd (art. 134 LATC)
Landowner v. Municipality on Agricultural Rezoning
Cited to show that the municipal zoning regulation was not in conformity with the law regarding the former 'zone sans affectation spéciale'.
AC.1996.0011 · vd (art. 134 lit. b LATC)
Landowner v. Municipality on Agricultural Rezoning
Cited to note that the land in question was unbuildable under the current regulation and would remain so if the contested decision were upheld.
AC.1991.0237 · vd (Art. 134 LATC)
Property Owner Appeals Municipal Building Authorizations Over Use Change and Insufficient Plans
Cited in the reasoning for determining the applicable legal regime but did not form the basis of the dispositive order itself (which rejected the first appeal based on Art. 111 LATC).