700.11
LATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 128 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Permis d'habiter ou d'utiliser
Titre IX, Chapitre VII
Art. 128 LATC · Permis d'habiter ou d'utiliser
1. Aucune construction nouvelle ou transformée ne peut être occupée sans l'autorisation de la municipalité. Cette autorisation, donnée sous la forme d'un permis, ne peut être délivrée que si les conditions fixées par le permis de construire ont été respectées et si l'exécution correspond aux plans mis à l'enquête. Le préavis de la commission de salubrité est requis.
2. La municipalité statue dans le délai de quinze jours dès le dépôt de la demande de permis.
3. Le permis ne comporte pas, pour les entreprises industrielles et celles, non industrielles, présentant des risques importants au sens de la législation fédérale sur le travail, le droit d'exploiter.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (45)
AC.2022.0414 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Municipality's Occupancy Permit Refusal Annulled for Lack of Legal Basis and Documentation
Although the decision was annulled due to formal defects, the court indicated that the challenged decision likely operated under this article concerning the inspection of compliance with the building permit for the occupancy permit.
AC.2022.0315 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Property Owner Challenges Permit Conditions Based on Pending Zoning Amendments
Cited in the reasoning to conclude that a use permit cannot be refused based on exterior development conditions not related to health or safety, leading to the annulment of condition 1.1.5.
AC.2022.0010 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality on Land Use Interpretation
Cited regarding the possibility for the municipality to examine the issuance of the occupancy permit upon referral.
AC.2020.0329 · vd (Art. 128 al. 1 LATC)
Building Permit Appeal Inadmissibility Following Withdrawal of Opposition
Cited as the legal basis for the requirement of an occupation permit and the condition that the construction must comply with the building permit.
AC.2019.0256 · vd (Art. 128 LATC)
Apartment Owners' Internal Division vs. Municipal Restoration Order
Cited by the municipality in its correspondence regarding the requirements for the occupancy permit, which was used as part of the context for the dispute.
AC.2020.0285 · vd (Art. 128 al. 1 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Fire Safety Remediation Order
This provision establishes the requirement for a building permit (permis d'habiter) and was implicitly used as the legal basis for the administrative orders concerning the building's occupancy, which the court confirmed.
AC.2021.0068 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Property Owner's Obligation to Document All Unauthorized Construction for Regularization
Cited in the reasoning regarding the prohibition on occupying a new or transformed construction without municipal authorization (the occupancy permit).
AC.2020.0234 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Para-Hotel Activity in Villa Zone
This provision concerning occupation without authorization is mentioned in the context of an inadmissible appeal regarding the criminal denunciation (Order V).
AC.2019.0296 · vd (Art. 128 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Fence Non-Conformities
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the requirements for issuing an occupancy permit, relevant to the principal requests concerning the nullity of permit n° 79/19.
Jug.2018.37 · vd (art. 128 LATC)
Appellant v. State: Usury by Trade and Property Offenses Appeal
Cited in the introductory section of the dispositive, relating to contravention of the LATC, confirmed in order II.
AC.2015.0081 · vd (art. 128 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; RSV 700.11))
Neighbor Challenge to Agricultural Expansion Permits Over Safety and Environmental Concerns
Used to refuse the occupancy permit for building ECA 225 because construction conditions (lightning protection) were not met.
AC.2015.0272 · vd (Art. 128 LATC)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Occupancy Permit Refusal Based on Post-Occupancy/Disputed Compliance
The court implicitly used this article as the legal basis governing the requirement and issuance of the occupancy permit, which was the subject of the annulled decision.
AC.2015.0096 · vd (art. 128 et 129 LATC)
Property Holder v. Municipality Regarding Revocation of Occupancy Permit
Cited to define the purpose of the permit to occupy/use, contextualizing the application of Art. 93 LATC.
69.2015.PHC · vd (art. 128 al. 1 LATC)
Hotel Expansion Road Improvement Dispute
Cited regarding the rule that no new or transformed construction can be occupied without the municipality's authorization (the occupancy permit).
AC.2014.0079 · vd (art. 128 al. 1 LATC)
Municipal Order Compliance and Zoning Violation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning section to define the verification required for an occupancy permit.