700.11 LATC

CH-VD

Art. 108 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Forme de la demande de permis

Titre IX, Chapitre V

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (139 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 108 LATC · Forme de la demande de permis

1. La demande de permis est adressée à la municipalité. Elle est signée par celui qui fait exécuter les travaux et, s'il s'agit de travaux à exécuter sur le fonds d'autrui, par le propriétaire du fonds. Elle indique les dérogations requises et les dispositions réglementaires sur lesquelles elles sont fondées.

2. Le règlement cantonal et les règlements communaux déterminent, pour les divers modes de construction et catégories de travaux, les plans et les pièces à produire avec la demande, ainsi que le nombre d'exemplaires requis. La demande n'est tenue pour régulièrement déposée que lorsque ces exigences sont remplies.

3. La municipalité, le cas échéant le département, peut exiger le profilement ou des montages photographiques de la construction projetée, aux frais de la personne sollicitant le permis.

← Art. 107a LATC sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Buts Art. 109 LATC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (167)

AC.2024.0263 · vd (art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Appeal of Building Permit for Close Proximity Construction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the impossibility of encroaching on the appellants' land without their agreement, which is a key factor in the modification of the building's location.

AC.2024.0158 · vd (Art. 108 al. 3 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l’aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; BLV 700.11))

Appeal Against Mobile Communication System Permit Based on Radiation Standards

Cited when rejecting the appellant's argument regarding the absence of templates (gabarits).

AC.2023.0350 · vd (art. 108 al. 2 LATC)

Municipal Building Permit Upheld in Winegrower's House Renovation Appeal

Cited implicitly in reasoning section 4a/aa as the basis for the delegation governing the application dossier.

AC.2023.0054 · vd (art. 108 LATC)

Applicant v. Municipality (Garden Annex Permit Refusal)

Cited in the closing part of the reasoning as the general rule for the application dossier needed for a public inquiry.

AC.2023.0352 · vd (Art. 108 ss LATC)

Property Owners Appeal Palisade Height Restriction

Cited in the reasoning regarding the procedure for submitting an authorization request (for regularization).

AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 108 al. 2 LATC)

Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping

This article, delegating the regulation of permit application form and inquiry file constitution to the cantonal level, was cited in relation to the review of the exterior plan's completeness.

AC.2020.0320 · vd (art. 108 al. 2 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC; BLV 700.11))

Landowners v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Chalet in Protected Site

Cited in the reasoning leading to the admission of the appeal based on the lack of an existing parcel '1072a' in the building permit application.

AC.2022.0100 · vd (art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Landowner LVAT Liability Upon Issuance of Building Permit to Superficies Holder

This procedural rule was cited in the reasoning to support the argument that the landowner's signature was essential for the building permit, linking him to the triggering event for tax maturity.

AC.2022.0196 · vd (Art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Boundary Fence Authorization)

The rejection of the appeal was based on the lack of signature from the neighboring owner required for works on the property line under this provision.

AC.2022.0133 · vd (art. 108 de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et des constructions (LATC; BLV 700.11))

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Challenge of Initial Restoration Order and Lack of Co-Ownership Consent

Cited in the reasoning to support the proportionality argument against authorizing the work without co-owner signatures.

AC.2022.0058 · vd (art. 108 LATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit Over Height Violation and Unauthorized Impact on Protected Trees

The court admitted the appeal based on the principle that damage to neighbors' trees (even on adjacent property) requires their express agreement, citing this article regarding the required signature on the building permit application.

AC.2021.0338 · vd (Art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Forest Owner v. Hydroelectric Operator and State Regarding Encroachment and Dam Alteration

Cited in the reasoning to discuss the requirement for the signature of the landowner on a building permit application.

AC.2021.0280 · vd (Art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Municipal Building Permit Appeal Regarding Window Modifications

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for the property owner's signature on the building permit application, which was examined in the context of the property boundary dispute.

AC.2020.0280 · vd (Art. 108 al. 1 LATC)

Appeal Against Municipal Building Permit for Access Routes and Structures Outside Building Zone Allowed

Cited because the appeal succeeded based on the lack of signature of the burdened property owners for works on a servitude path.

AC.2019.0256 · vd (Art. 108 LATC)

Apartment Owners' Internal Division vs. Municipal Restoration Order

Cited by the appellants in the reasoning to argue that coproprietors' agreement was not required for regularization.