700.11
LATC
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 106 LOI sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (LATC) - Elaboration des projets de construction
Titre IX, Chapitre V
Art. 106 LATC · Elaboration des projets de construction
1. Les plans de toute construction mise à l'enquête, à l'exception des constructions de minime importance, doivent être établis et signés soit par un architecte, soit par un ingénieur pour les plans particuliers relevant de sa spécialité.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (25)
AC.2022.0007 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighboring Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit for Ramp Lacking Professional Certification)
The appeal was admitted based on the violation of this article regarding the required signature for construction plans.
AC.2020.0265 · vd (Art. 106 LATC)
Municipal Building Permit Challenge and Zoning Compliance
Cited in the reasoning (Considerant 5.b) regarding the requirement for plans to be signed by an architect, but not explicitly cited in the final orders.
AC.2016.0214 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighbors v. Municipality (Building Permit for Artisan Workshops)
This article regarding the requirement for an architect's signature on plans was invoked by the appellants but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
AC.2011.0008 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighbors v. Local Authority over Attic Conversion Permit
This provision was cited as a requirement for future submissions, mandating that plans be signed by an architect or engineer.
AC.2010.0007 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Chalet Extension Permit Challenge Upheld After Parcel Merger
The court addressed the appellant's argument regarding the requirement for plans to be signed by an architect or engineer, concluding that the exception for constructions of minimal importance applied.
AC.2008.0265 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighbors v. Building Permit for Gate and Paving
Cited to confirm that the construction works were of minimal importance, thus exempting the provider from requiring an architect or engineer signature.
AC.2007.0069 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Building Permit Modification vs. Habitable Space Conversion and Regulatory Compliance
The decision required that the file to be submitted for the new main inquiry must be established by an architect.
AC.2005.0253 · vd (Art. 106 LATC)
Homeowners v. Municipality: Building Permit Exemption Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to establish a procedural ground for refusal based on the requirement for plans signed by an architect for non-minimal works.
AC.2005.0112 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighboring Owners v. Municipality: Building Permit Annulled for Lack of Public Inquiry
Although cited in the reasoning regarding missing documents, it is the procedural basis justifying the annulment because the necessary plans were not established (Order II).
AC.2004.0062 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Neighbor Appeal Against Agricultural Tunnel Shelters Regarding Setback Violation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for plans to be drawn by an architect or engineer, which was implicitly confirmed not to be violated for minor constructions.
AC.1999.0018 · vd (Art. 106 LATC)
Villa Development FAR and Habitable Space Dispute
Cited in the context of determining which plan (géomètre or architect) should prevail regarding distances between constructions, which is part of the grounds for annulling the decision.
AC.1998.0012 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Annulment of Municipal Construction Permit Due to Deficient Plans and Zoning Violations
The court uses the lack of compliance with this article (requiring architect/engineer plans) as a primary ground for annulling the permit.
AC.1997.0231 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Property Owner Appeal Regarding Unnoticed Parking Space Regularization
Cited in the reasoning in contrast (a contrario) when discussing the necessity of a supplementary inquiry for minor modifications.
AC.1997.0166 · vd (Droit vaudois de la construction, note 4 ad art. 106 LATC)
Municipal Veranda Permit Annulment Due to Insufficient Architectural Plans and Distance Violations
Cited as supporting authority for the annulment of the building permit due to the violation of Art. 106 LATC.
AC.1997.0166 · vd (art. 106 LATC)
Municipal Veranda Permit Annulment Due to Insufficient Architectural Plans and Distance Violations
The appeal by Jaroslav Sotornik is admitted because the building plans did not comply with the requirement that they be established by an architect.