700.11.1 RLATC

CH-VD

Art. 39 RÈGLEMENT d'application de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (RLATC) - Dépendances de peu d'importance et autres aménagements assimilés [ 6, 10 ]

Titre II, Chapitre I, Section IV

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (65 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 39 RLATC · Dépendances de peu d'importance et autres aménagements assimilés [ 6, 10 ]

1. A défaut de dispositions communales contraires, les municipalités peuvent autoriser la construction de dépendances de peu d'importance, dont l'utilisation est liée à l'occupation du bâtiment principal, dans les espaces réglementaires entre bâtiments ou entre bâtiments et limites de propriété.

2. Par dépendances de peu d'importance, on entend des constructions distinctes du bâtiment principal, sans communication interne avec celui-ci et dont le volume est de peu d'importance par rapport à celui du bâtiment principal, telles que pavillons, réduits de jardin ou garages particuliers pour deux voitures au plus. Ces dépendances ne peuvent en aucun cas servir à l'habitation ou à l'activité professionnelle.

3. Ces règles sont également valables pour d'autres ouvrages que des dépendances proprement dites: murs de soutènement, clôtures, places de stationnement à l'air libre notamment.

4. Ces constructions ne peuvent être autorisées que pour autant qu'elles n'entraînent aucun préjudice pour les voisins.

5. Sont réservées notamment les dispositions du code rural et foncier [M] et de la loi vaudoise d'introduction du Code civil , ainsi que celles relatives à la prévention des incendies [N] et aux campings et caravanings [O] .

← Art. 38 RLATC RÈGLEMENT d'application de la loi du 4 décembre 1985 sur l'aménagement du territoire et les constructions (RLATC), Annexe 3: Annexe III Art. 40 RLATC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (86)

AC.2025.0120 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit for Parking Structure

The court implicitly found a violation of this provision (referenced via Art. 67 al. 1 RPGA) concerning the classification and impact of the structure as a dependency, leading to the permit's annulment.

AC.2024.0137 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Landowners v. Municipality and Cantonal Department on Zoning Reserved Zone

Cited in the proposed substituted text for Article 3 RZR, which was considered but ultimately not adopted in the final orders.

AC.2023.0387 · vd (Art. 39 al. 2 RLATC)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit and Tree Removal

This provision defining minor annexes is cited in the reasoning but not in the dispositive orders (I to IV).

AC.2023.0320 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Challenge)

The court used this provision to qualify the proposed shed and garden hut as dependencies of minor importance, which allowed their placement in regulatory spaces.

AC.2022.0301 · vd (art. 39 al. 4 RLATC)

Appeal Dismissed: Challenge to Multi-Unit Development Approval Despite Objections to Basement, Parking, and Landscaping

The court confirmed that the ramp did not cause prejudice to neighbors that would be unbearable without excessive sacrifice, as required by this article regarding structures in regulatory spaces.

AC.2022.0209 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Neighboring Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Refusal for Villa Enlargement)

Mentioned in relation to the definition of 'minor dependency' exceptions under the RZR.

AC.2021.0343 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Unattached Villas Violating Minimum Separation Distance

Used to assess whether the projected swimming pools could be considered 'dependencies of little importance' under this provision.

AC.2021.0343 · vd (art. 39 al. 4 RLATC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Unattached Villas Violating Minimum Separation Distance

Used to check whether the swimming pools would cause appreciable prejudice to the neighbors, which the court found they did not.

AC.2021.0190 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Planting Boxes and Right-of-Way Servitude

The court implicitly confirmed that the decision on the construction permit (bacs à plantes) did not violate this provision regarding prejudice to neighbors.

AC.2021.0206 · vd (Art. 39 RLATC)

Neighbors v. Municipality (Retaining Wall Height)

This article, which assimilates retaining walls to annexes, was cited in the reasoning for analyzing the legality of the retaining wall within the regulatory space.

AC.2020.0250 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Owner's Appeal Against Municipal Demolition and Compliance Orders for Annexes and Poultry Shed

Cited in the reasoning for determining the admissibility of annexes ECA 103b and 103c as minor dependencies.

AC.2019.0105 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Appeal Against Municipal Construction Restriction in Reserved Zone

Cited in relation to the limitations imposed by the reserved zone regulation on minor annexes (Art. 3 al. 2 RZR).

AC.2020.0078 · vd (art. 39 al. 2 RLATC)

Appeal Regarding Building Permit Denial for Mezzanine Enlargements and Garage Modifications

The court partially admitted the appeal, overturning the refusal concerning the car cover based on jurisprudence interpreting this provision regarding dependencies of little importance.

AC.2019.0236 · vd (art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Building Permit Appeal)

The court confirmed the municipal decision based on the analysis regarding the authorization of ancillary buildings in regulatory spaces, especially concerning the absence of excessive prejudice to neighbors (Art. 39 al. 4 RLATC).

AC.2019.0296 · vd (Art. 39 RLATC)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Fence Non-Conformities

Cited in the reasoning section to assess the conformity of the fence (palissade) with construction law provisions, which directly affects the decision on the merits of the appeal.