642.11
LI
CH-VD
Art. 143 LOI sur les impôts directs cantonaux (LI) - Bénéficiaires de prestations provenant d'institutions de prévoyance de droit privé
Partie IV, Titre II
Art. 143 LI · Bénéficiaires de prestations provenant d'institutions de prévoyance de droit privé
1. S'ils sont domiciliés à l'étranger, les bénéficiaires de prestations provenant d'institutions de droit privé de prévoyance professionnelle ayant leur siège ou un établissement stable dans le canton ou fournies selon des formes reconnues de prévoyance individuelle liée doivent l'impôt sur ces prestations.
2. Le taux de l'impôt est prévu par la loi annuelle d'impôt . Pour les prestations en capital, il est calculé conformément à l'article 49.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (5)
FI.2021.0035 · vd (Art. 143 al. 1 LI)
Taxpayer v. Tax Authority Regarding Withholding Tax Reimbursement for Algerian Resident
This cantonal provision establishes the source tax obligation on capital benefits for non-residents, which is the subject matter of the dispute regarding reimbursement.
FI.2019.0183 · vd (Art. 143 al. 1 LIFD)
Taxpayer Appeal Regarding Disallowed Vehicle Expenses Based on Schematic Ratio Method
Mentioned as the legal basis for the Cantonal Commission of Appeal's power to amend the assessment to the detriment of the taxpayer, which relates to the reform in peius.
FI.2019.0184 · vd (art. 143 al. 1 LIFD)
Taxpayers v. Tax Authority: Deemed Distribution of Private Vehicle Expenses (2006 Fiscal Period)
The court confirms its competence to modify the assessment to the detriment of the taxpayer (reformatio in peius) after instruction, as provided for in this article.
FI.2010.0015 · vd (Art. 143 al. 1 LIFD)
Tax Reassessment and Evasion Fines Appeal
Cited in reasoning section 6 as part of the legal basis allowing the cantonal appeal authority to modify the decision to the detriment of the appellant (reformatio in pejus).
FI.1999.0037 · vd (art. 143 al. 1 LIFD)
Tax Reassessment Appeals on Capital Gains from Share Sales and Real Estate Transfer
Cited as a procedural rule allowing the administrative court to rule beyond the parties' conclusions.