416.11
LAEF
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 35 LOI sur l’aide aux études et à la formation professionnelle (LAEF) - Aides perçues indûment ou détournées
Chapitre II, Section IV
Art. 35 LAEF · Aides perçues indûment ou détournées
1. L'allocation perçue doit entièrement être restituée par le bénéficiaire qui
a. a obtenu indûment cette aide de l'Etat sur la base d'informations inexactes ou incomplètes ;
b. a détourné l'aide à d'autres fins que celles auxquelles la présente loi les destine.
2. Toute nouvelle demande d'aide financière peut être rejetée temporairement ou définitivement.
3. Si le réexamen de la situation du requérant, notamment dans le cas visé à l'article 41, alinéa 2, conduit à constater que tout ou partie de l'aide a été versée à tort, celle-ci doit être restituée.
4. Les allocations doivent être restituées dans les 30 jours suivant la notification de la décision de restitution.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (12)
BO.2024.0007 · vd (Art. 35 LAEF)
Cantonal Grant Repayment Obligation Calculation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to reimburse unduly received aid, relevant to the overall context of the restitution claim.
BO.2024.0007 · vd (Art. 35 al. 3 LAEF)
Cantonal Grant Repayment Obligation Calculation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning (though not explicitly in the final orders) as the basis for restitution when re-examination shows aid was wrongly paid, which is the core issue of the case. However, since the final order (II) refers to the reasoning for the decision to annul, this provision underpins the substantive annulment.
BO.2025.0001 · vd (Art. 35 al. 1 let. a LAEF)
Student Grant Reimbursement Upheld Due to Failure to Report Parental Income Change
The court confirms the obligation of the appellant to restitute the unduly paid scholarship amount because it was based on inexact information.
BO.2024.0011 · vd (art. 35 al. 3 LAEF)
Students v. Cantonal Study Grant Office (Recalculation of Grants Based on Actually Received Parental Income)
The court decision resulted in the annulment of the orders requiring restitution, which are based on this provision, but the final orders do not explicitly cite it as the ground for the final judgment.
BO.2024.0012 · vd (Art. 35 al. 3 LAEF)
Student Grant Reimbursement Based on Retroactive Pension Benefits
This article, concerning the restitution of undue aid following a review of the situation, justifies the authority's principle in demanding repayment, although this specific article is not explicitly cited in the final orders (II-IV), it is central to the reasoning confirming the decision.
BO.2023.0015 · vd (art. 35 al. 3 LAEF)
Cantonal Study Grant Recoupment and Cohabitation Dispute
Cited as the basis for the authority to re-examine the initial scholarship grant for the 2019/2020 academic year.
BO.2022.0008 · vd (art. 35 al. 1 et 3 LAEF)
Scholarship Restitution Overruled Due to Agency's Prior Knowledge and Bad Faith
The court found that the conditions for ordering restitution under this article were not met, leading to the admission of the appeal.
BO.2021.0003 · vd (Art. 35 LAEF)
Appellant v. Cantonal Study Grant Office: Recalculation and Repayment of Study Grant Due to Undeclared Income
Cited as the basis for demanding the restitution of unduly received aid due to inaccurate or incomplete information.
BO.2019.0024 · vd (art. 35 LAEF)
Scholarship Restitution and Award Challenge
Cited in the reasoning section to establish the basis for restitution if aid was granted wrongfully, which directly supports the confirmation of the restitution order in point II.
BO.2020.0018 · vd (art. 35 al. 3 LAEF)
Appeal Allowed: Retroactive Revocation of Training Grants Over Disability Insurance Repayment
This article, concerning the obligation to restitute unduly paid aid following a review, was central to the context of the reassessment that the court ultimately overturned.
BO.2019.0003 · vd (art. 35 LAEF)
Study Grant Repayment Due to Undisclosed Disability Pension Income
The court upheld the decision to order restitution because the appellant received undue aid based on incomplete information, as detailed in this article.
BO.2017.0012 · vd (art. 35 LAEF)
Applicant v. Administrative Authority: Eligibility for Study Aid Post-Apprenticeship Contract Termination
Cited in the reasoning regarding the possibility of restitution, which the court postponed for the authority to examine after further instruction.