Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
416.11 LAEF CH-VD

Art. 32 LOI sur l’aide aux études et à la formation professionnelle (LAEF) - Fin du droit aux prestations

Chapitre II, Section IV
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (54 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 32 LAEF · Fin du droit aux prestations

1. L'aide financière de l'Etat cesse dès le moment où le bénéficiaire ne remplit plus l'une des conditions prévues par la loi.

← Art. 31 LAEF sur l’aide aux études et à la formation professionnelle (LAEF) - Objet Art. 33 LAEF →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (7)

BO.2023.0012 · vd (Art. 32 LAEF)
Appeal Concerning Reimbursement of Study Grant Due to Program Cessation
Cited as the general provision allowing the State aid to cease when conditions are no longer met, justifying restitution.
BO.2021.0018 · vd (art. 32 LAEF)
Scholarship Repayment for Interrupted Vocational Training
Cited alongside art. 33 LAEF, it justifies requiring the reimbursement of aid received for the period of study not followed.
BO.2017.0012 · vd (art. 32 LAEF)
Applicant v. Administrative Authority: Eligibility for Study Aid Post-Apprenticeship Contract Termination
Cited in the reasoning to establish when state financial aid ceases, relevant context for the main issue.
BO.2014.0016 · vd (art. 32 LAEF)
Grant Repayment Prescription Interruption Dispute
The court used this article to conclude that the request for restitution of the scholarship was time-barred (prescribed).
BO.2014.0019 · vd (Art. 32 LAEF)
Appeal on Repayment of Study Grants Due to Time-Barred Prescription Period
The main ground for dismissing the claim for restitution is the prescription established by this article, which was successfully argued by the appellant.
BO.2008.0069 · vd (Art. 32 LAEF)
Education Grant Reimbursement Partial Upholding and Prescription Ruling
This article establishes the five-year prescription period for restitution claims, which the court used to rule that the excess amount claimed was prescribed.
BO.2007.0121 · vd (Art. 32 LAEF)
Cantonal Scholarship Repayment for Non-Qualifying Studies
Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the claim for restitution was not time-barred.