Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
412.11 LESSMENO CH-VD

Art. 32 LOI sur l'enseignement secondaire supérieur (LESS) - Sanctions [ 8 ]

Chapitre V
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (53 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 32 LESS · Sanctions [ 8 ]

1. Les sanctions disciplinaires suivantes peuvent être prononcées

- le devoir supplémentaire ;

- l'exclusion d'une leçon ;

- la retenue ;

- l'exclusion temporaire ;

- l'exclusion définitive.

2. L'exclusion temporaire peut être assortie d'un changement d'établissement.

← Art. 31 LESS sur l'enseignement secondaire supérieur (LESS) - Champ d'application [ 10 ] Art. 32a LESS →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (5)

GE.2006.0191 · vd (art. 32 LESS)
Student Exclusion Upheld for Filming Group Assault
This article, allowing for final exclusion as a disciplinary sanction, is mentioned in the context justifying the severity of the sanction upheld by the court.
GE.1996.0032 · vd (art. 32 LESS)
Student Exclusion Upheld Despite Extension and Exam Proximity
Cited in the reasoning section (Point 4) concerning disciplinary sanctions, used as a reference point for assessing prolongation refusals.
GE.1992.0096 · vd (art. 32 LESS)
Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Schooling Due to Absences and Misconduct
Cited in the reasoning to establish the list of possible disciplinary sanctions, which informs the ground for the decision regarding the severity of the refusal.
GE.1992.0091 · vd (Art. 32 LESS)
Student Appeal Against Schooling Extension Refusal
Cited in conjunction with Art. 118 LS to establish the framework for disciplinary sanctions, supporting the reasoning for the proportionality analysis regarding the denial of continuation of schooling.
GE.1991.0009 · vd (Art. 32 LESS)
Student Voluntary Grade Repetition Appeal
This article on sanctions was cited in the reasoning leading to the finding of a proportionality violation, but not in the dispositive orders.